Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DIRTYSECRET

Hers wasn’t much of the victory she that claim did not involve Depp but instead his agent (or was it lawyer?).


27 posted on 06/01/2022 1:47:31 PM PDT by Jane Austen (Neo-cons are liberal Democrats who love illegal aliens and war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Jane Austen

lawyer under agency law


29 posted on 06/01/2022 1:48:24 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Jane Austen

*He had a net win and she had a net loss. I doubt many would view her side as anything other than a Pyrrhic victory.*
Pyrrhic? No comprende. Big words.

*No one believes it was a draw, not even Amber Heard who said she was devastated with the verdict.* That’s what lawyers are for. Claim victory.

Look-Michelle Triola wanted $7 MILLION. Judge awarded her $102 thousand-threw here a BONE. Landmark case(palimony). It PROVED one could sue and get rewarded for that stuff. It’s all that mattered to one side-big news. An appeals court stepped in and she did not get her money but the POINT WAS MADE. Get it?

Depp/Heard-you want them both to lose. Michelle Triola/Marvin?-you had to choose sides. Proper verdict both times but justice served? We’re being played.


92 posted on 06/01/2022 3:26:19 PM PDT by DIRTYSECRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson