Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Beijing needs the ability to 'destroy' Starlink, say Chinese researchers
The Register ^ | 25 May 2022 | Laura Dobberstein

Posted on 05/25/2022 11:10:13 AM PDT by ShadowAce

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 05/25/2022 11:10:13 AM PDT by ShadowAce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rdb3; JosephW; martin_fierro; Still Thinking; zeugma; Vinnie; ironman; Egon; raybbr; AFreeBird; ...

2 posted on 05/25/2022 11:10:42 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

The same China that got caught faking space missions a few years ago? That China?

I don’t think Musk has to worry too much.


3 posted on 05/25/2022 11:13:23 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Starlink needs the ability to destroy Chinese researchers.

Fixed it.


4 posted on 05/25/2022 11:14:06 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
Should China take down Starlink, there are more satellite broadband systems to follow. Amazon's 3,236 Project Kuiper birds are ready for flight.

Who the heck wrote this article?

1. Amazon hasn't launched even ONE satelite let alone their satellite system being “ready”.
2. China cannot take down Starlink. Russia tried it over Ukraine and got nowhere . And Starlink is not even available in China.

5 posted on 05/25/2022 11:19:32 AM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

Maybe I am forgetting something, but what fake missions?


6 posted on 05/25/2022 11:19:48 AM PDT by Magnum44 (...against all enemies, foreign and domestic... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Pretty obvious where this is going.

Low-Earth orbits will eventually be impossible due to billions of high-velocity bits of shattered satellites, each one of which can destroy a manned spacecraft.

Oh well, they fall out of orbit fairly quickly due to atmospheric friction. Kind of like radioactive pollution. The nastier isotopes decay pretty fast. The long-lived ones aren’t nearly as dangerous.


7 posted on 05/25/2022 11:22:08 AM PDT by Steely Tom ([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

“Starlink needs the ability to destroy Chinese researchers.”

Much of “Chinese research” is Chinese graduate students in US universities passing research data to the CCP.


8 posted on 05/25/2022 11:22:41 AM PDT by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

9 posted on 05/25/2022 11:23:39 AM PDT by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

Russia tried jamming starlink and failed.

China is saying they need to figure out a way to take down Starlink. The threat is real and China might figure out a way.

This is why we need Space Force. War in Orbit is a thing.


10 posted on 05/25/2022 11:25:38 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: libh8er
I know of one ivy-league university in which 100% — every single one — of its current PhD students in AI are Chinese (PRC) citizens.
11 posted on 05/25/2022 11:27:30 AM PDT by Steely Tom ([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

I’m no expert when it comes to this technology but I do know the Russians tried to jam them and the Starlink staff was able to take countermeasures quickly that made all future jamming attempts ineffective.

Physically knocking down enough of those small, cheap cubesats would be quite a challenge....and then how would you stop them from simply deploying more when one launch vehicle can carry scores of them to patch any holes in the network?


12 posted on 05/25/2022 11:28:51 AM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FLT-bird
Physically knocking down enough of those small, cheap cubesats would be quite a challenge....and then how would you stop them from simply deploying more when one launch vehicle can carry scores of them to patch any holes in the network?

Don't forget the use of lightweight, radar-reflecting decoys, as were used as a countermeasure to SDI.

13 posted on 05/25/2022 11:30:26 AM PDT by Steely Tom ([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

As I’ve been saying, the next world war will be fought in space. I just hope our new Space Force military branch is on it. I remember reading many Air Force IT personnel transferring to Space Force. Could be wrong.


14 posted on 05/25/2022 11:30:57 AM PDT by A Navy Vet (USA Birth Certificate - 1787. Death Certificate - 2021. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
Wasn't primarily China and Russia who started weaponizing space? Aside, of course, from our peaceful, surveillance satellites.

"Elon has the high ground."

15 posted on 05/25/2022 11:30:59 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
China cannot and will not take down Starlink, which is not even available in China.
16 posted on 05/25/2022 11:32:17 AM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

How has getting in bed with the Chicoms working out for you Elon? Does China still “rock” as you put it?


17 posted on 05/25/2022 11:34:04 AM PDT by proust (All posts made under this handle are, for the intents and purposes of the author, considered satire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: FLT-bird
Physically knocking down enough of those small, cheap cubesats would be quite a challenge...

Well, not really. I do understand the "unexpected consequences" and that it's not politically or socially feasible, but a couple of EMPs up there would take out a huge portion of the satellites.

It won't happen, but it's not that big of a (technical) challenge.

18 posted on 05/25/2022 11:38:40 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

Jeff Bezos was just suggesting that Musk was too cozy with China, but that was likely projection.


19 posted on 05/25/2022 12:05:33 PM PDT by aynrandfreak (Being a Democrat means never having to say you're sorry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

There are over 2500 of them launched, but tracking them is easy enough:
https://satellitemap.space/


20 posted on 05/25/2022 12:17:02 PM PDT by Rio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson