Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/25/2022 11:10:13 AM PDT by ShadowAce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: rdb3; JosephW; martin_fierro; Still Thinking; zeugma; Vinnie; ironman; Egon; raybbr; AFreeBird; ...

2 posted on 05/25/2022 11:10:42 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce

The same China that got caught faking space missions a few years ago? That China?

I don’t think Musk has to worry too much.


3 posted on 05/25/2022 11:13:23 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce

Starlink needs the ability to destroy Chinese researchers.

Fixed it.


4 posted on 05/25/2022 11:14:06 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce
Should China take down Starlink, there are more satellite broadband systems to follow. Amazon's 3,236 Project Kuiper birds are ready for flight.

Who the heck wrote this article?

1. Amazon hasn't launched even ONE satelite let alone their satellite system being “ready”.
2. China cannot take down Starlink. Russia tried it over Ukraine and got nowhere . And Starlink is not even available in China.

5 posted on 05/25/2022 11:19:32 AM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce

Pretty obvious where this is going.

Low-Earth orbits will eventually be impossible due to billions of high-velocity bits of shattered satellites, each one of which can destroy a manned spacecraft.

Oh well, they fall out of orbit fairly quickly due to atmospheric friction. Kind of like radioactive pollution. The nastier isotopes decay pretty fast. The long-lived ones aren’t nearly as dangerous.


7 posted on 05/25/2022 11:22:08 AM PDT by Steely Tom ([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce

9 posted on 05/25/2022 11:23:39 AM PDT by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce

I’m no expert when it comes to this technology but I do know the Russians tried to jam them and the Starlink staff was able to take countermeasures quickly that made all future jamming attempts ineffective.

Physically knocking down enough of those small, cheap cubesats would be quite a challenge....and then how would you stop them from simply deploying more when one launch vehicle can carry scores of them to patch any holes in the network?


12 posted on 05/25/2022 11:28:51 AM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce

As I’ve been saying, the next world war will be fought in space. I just hope our new Space Force military branch is on it. I remember reading many Air Force IT personnel transferring to Space Force. Could be wrong.


14 posted on 05/25/2022 11:30:57 AM PDT by A Navy Vet (USA Birth Certificate - 1787. Death Certificate - 2021. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce
Wasn't primarily China and Russia who started weaponizing space? Aside, of course, from our peaceful, surveillance satellites.

"Elon has the high ground."

15 posted on 05/25/2022 11:30:59 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce

There are over 2500 of them launched, but tracking them is easy enough:
https://satellitemap.space/


20 posted on 05/25/2022 12:17:02 PM PDT by Rio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; ...

P


29 posted on 05/25/2022 8:53:37 PM PDT by bitt ( <img src=' 'width=50%> )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson