[DannyTN]

We either pay now and support Ukraine’s fighters, or we pay later and send our own kids when Russia tries to expand again.

I’d rather weaponize Ukraine’s fighters than have to send our own down the road.

This is cheap compared to what it will cost us later.

[Jane Long]

Complete horse hockey.

[JonPreston]

We either pay now and support Ukraine’s fighters, or we pay later

How did we pay for this?

It's money we don't have so we printed it and added it to the $29 trillion dollar debt.

[Osage Orange]

Totally disagree.

[Jane Long]

We either pay now and support Ukraine's fighters, or we pay later and send our own kids when Russia tries to expand again.

I'd rather weaponize Ukraine's fighters than have to send our own down the road.

This is cheap compared to what it will cost us later.

---

Only, no.

Here ya go ....

[Its All Over Except ...]

Russia could have attacked a NATO country and didn’t, they won’t attack a NATO country because they would lose, and it’s time for Europe to grow up and deal with their own backyard instead of sponging off of us so your talk is neocon nonsense, Danny.

[KOZ.]

Exactly. Unfortunately for the Putin bots, it helps Ukraine wipe the floor with the Russian military.

[Repealthe17thAmendment]

Unless this $40 billion escalates and prolongs this war until we have to get in. In that case, we are paying $40 billion as our entry fee, when we should have folded.

There is no reason to believe that Russia is going to attack a NATO country in the future.