Posted on 05/11/2022 7:30:53 PM PDT by fwdude
Don't think this wasn't planned from the beginning of last year. It is the perfect crime, almost.
Ever since rumors of Breyer's retirement announcement, leftists have been licking their chops to cheat on the highest court of the land. And Breyer is in on it.
Consider that the Dems began the confirmation process in haste while Breyer was still seated. Jackson was ultimately confirmed by the slimmest of margins, and Biden then SIGNED HER SUPREME COURT COMMISSION. It is not beyong possibility that she may be allowed to participate in voting in this case.
A 5-5 tie would result in the lower appellate court decision holding sway. At the very least, Roe would remain intact.
Prove me wrong - please!
If this weren’t 2022, I would say, “Go take your meds!” but this is 2022 and this could happen.
She didn’t hear the case.
She could have heard it virtually.
I think the Dems pulled a fast one on us.
“She could have heard it virtually.”
I think oral arguments were in October. And they don’t really decide the cases so much on the hearing as on the briefs. Jackson-Brown (or whatever her name is) cannot rule on this matter.
interesting theory. I wouldn’t put anything past the Dems at this point. They abide by no rules, legal or moral.
Even though she hasn’t heard the case this is absolutely plausible. The Democrats are absolutely lawless, there is nothing within the bounds of the law that can be used to stop them because they simply ignore the law and get away with doing so.
“… Prove me wrong - please!”
******************************
Time will prove you wrong. Not that that’s a consolation right now for you.
“Jackson-Brown (or whatever her name is) cannot rule on this matter.”
That’s the old Law...
This is now Meritless Garland Law.
Nope. That ain’t gonna happen
The makeup of the Court would have to be changed through legislation to allow ten justices for this scenario to happen.
The dems would have to nuke the filibuster, all 50 democrats plus Kamala Harris would have to vote for it. The House only needs a simple majority.
The scenario isn’t likely in my opinion.
She may have heard it virtually?
1) Provide some proof, I don’t want to get upset over nothing.
2) Oral arugments were heard by the SCOTUS Dec. 1 2021.
3) The draft majority opinion (by Alito) that was recently leaked was written back in February.
They really want CW-II, don’t they?
If she didn’t sit for the case, she won’t rule on the case... this is silly on its face...
You are going to need to get off the hallucinogenic drugs.
I agree, even though she did not hear the case and no sane person would imagine in a sane world it even be attempted and its probably against ever procedure. But as you indicated, this world has lost its sanity and refuses to take meds to fix it. I am actually glad I am not younger and have more years to live in this new clown world. The USA has flushed its greatness down the toilet and did not even bother to wipe its behind. My biggest hope is that in the next 30 seconds the rapture occurs and all Christians are saved from having to further witness todays unending perversions and depravity.
Dude - Back Away From The Bong!!
This is the most embarrassing vanity and comment I have ever read or heard online, in print, in person, on TV or radio, text, sign language, telegram or any other form of communication I may have left out. Sad. You should ask this cognitively disabled vanity to be deleted.
BREAKING: US Senate Blocks Democrat Abortion Bill
The US Senate blocked a bill that would make abortion legal in the United States by 49-51 votes on Wednesday. All Republicans voted against the bill and were joined by Sen. Joe Manchin (D).
The Guardian reported earlier today on the effort to make abortions legal per federal law.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/05/breaking-us-senate-blocks-democrat-abortion-bill/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.