Replies

I’ve been personally attacked for years now - check the keywords in the threads I post that say “ransomnut” “FRheldforransom” “GetHelp” etc. in addition to be accused of being a dangerous person, anti-vaxxer, incoherent, irrational etc.

I believe there is a geniune ethical offense in claiming to be a doctor and urging people to get vaccinated on the basis of that claim while hiding behind complete anonymity. Legitimate doctors dispensing legitimate advice are public persons whose records can be researched, employers checked etc.

I was appalled that Gas_dr urged someone who had failed to get any help from hospitals and her own doctor to keep going back to them, to check into the hospital even though she called in advance and the hospital said she would receive no real treatment. But gas_dr begged her, as did another FR ‘doctor’ utilizing unsubstantiated medical credentials to ‘let them help you.’ We heard later from the victim’s daughter that she went to the hospital and never received any treatment, and died.

If gas_dr wants to use claims of his medical credentials to direct FReepers into the path of an oncoming train, let him post his identifying information and let others evaluate him as they do all legitimate doctors.

gas_dr cannot make the claim that I am harming his medical reputation because he has given no evidence or identifying information that my information can ‘ruin’.

Please write your note to Jim Robinson and not to me.

You can't prove his help, or lack there of, had any blame to cast on him for your friend on Free Republic. She had to be on top of her situation far better, and neither you, nor gas_dr, were in the loop enough with her to have helped. If it is who I think it was, I think she was following, far too late, a very old version of the FLCCC protocol that was deficient. I had a nurse friend I had to direct to the latest update, too. It appeared to be the first preventative protocol, and the lady had a very advanced COVID case and she needed the ER, where she would have gotten attention, but it also wouldn't have been the best situation, at that time, as no antiviral would have been given (and wasn't, as I recall).

Should we be appalled you didn't help her, earlier, as she was following (very, very poorly) the protocol you were pushing?

Even the FLCCC says the vaccine is a reasonable option.

Ethical offense you may take is still not a reason to personally attack someone.

“I believe there is a geniune ethical offense in claiming to be a doctor and urging people to get vaccinated on the basis of that claim while hiding behind complete anonymity.”

Gosh. As if you post your real name as you peddle the fake medical claims of the Daily Expose.

And a genuine ethical offense is deceiving your followers about your personal agenda. You know all about that practice.

I bet that most of them have no idea that they are being fed the lunatic idea that the Covid virus doesn’t exist.

And that all of the covid death and disease is the result of “poison fake vaccines” that were secretly given out to everyone before the pandemic began.

You ought to make sure that they know exactly what your theory is. It’s dishonest to trick them by withholding it.