[doc11355]

If this holds up, I think it is adaptable to cars. If they can just match the energy performance of gasoline, hydrogen is a much better option than any battery.

Before we all get too worked up, let's pause a moment in remembrance of the Hindenburg. Remember, a tank of hydrogen can also be described as a potential bomb.

[Vermont Lt]

I could never understand why Nat gas never caught on for cars.

The “explosion” danger is less than that of a gasoline powered car.

[chaosagent]

So can a tank of gasoline.

[Celtic Conservative]

So can a tank of gasoline.

CC

[faucetman]

The Blimp wasn’t exactly a “tank”. It was a BALLOON.

[Paladin2]

So potentially are batteries and capacitors.

Energy be Energy.

Don’t EVER try to disobey the Laws of Physics [and Chemistry].

Science doesn’t have multiple tiers of Justice.

[itsahoot]

a tank of hydrogen can also be described as a potential bomb.

Hint, so can gasoline.

[Doc91678]

Daimler Benz worked for year to develop a hydrogen powered car. They’ve stopped the research.
https://electrek.co/2020/04/22/daimler-ends-hydrogen-car-development-because-its-too-costly/
See also:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2017/06/27/why-are-car-manufacturers-ignoring-hydrogen-engines/?sh=3fca39b4027d

[VideoDoctor]

Remember, a tank of hydrogen can also be described as a potential bomb.

I believe you've hit upon something there Jonty. /s

Probably WHY after the ATOM Bomb next they came with the HYDROGEN Bomb.