| after decades of people like Tony Fauci rewarding billions in tax payer dollars to those who play along with his dictates, pointing it out is now slandering those in medicine who do not. This isn't about Fauci. This is about the tens of thousands of medical professionals who you're accusing of intentionally misleading the public about the safety of these vaccines. ransomnote: Fauci invested billions in gaining control of the levels of power in the medical industry, colleges, med schools, research grants, institutes, hospitals, pharma and disciplinary levers of those institutions to strip research/funding/credentials to control his investment. Not everyone played along, or plays along, but the power structure around deliverying medicine has been captured (e.g., force almost all hospitals onto EPIC and then give Epic A.I. control over treating Covid patients to death, reward the hospitals for complying with tens of thousands of dollars). The CDC has done the same thing - dangled funding in front of those they would control now. Type the name of most colleges along with CDC and find that they are collaborating with the CDC on various projects. You're completely ignorant of the decades and billions that have been invested in overthrowing the United States through medical coup. Obviously those medical professionals being punished, threatened and silenced for trying to help patients and alert the public are not actively supporting the coup, just as innocent citizens are not actively helping the Biden coup. semimojo: Regardless of leadership the people on the front lines examining the data, reviewing the deaths and other adverse events, etc.m know what they're seeing. You're accusing them of concealing very damaging information. That's slander of everyday healthcare workers and you can't escape it. ransomnote: Just because you have no idea how power works in the medical community doesn't mean I have anything to escape. I wish you knew more, or even half of what you think you know. Some doctors beleived the CDC, and now regret it and are punished for saying so. Some doctors and nurses lost their jobs trying to warn the public. Some real healers are still trapped in the healthcare maze that the CDC created. But the power structure has been captured by the Deep State, or did you think the last two years was 'situation normal'? The CDC has infiltrated colleges and medicine at every level - to prepare for 'Covid', they even federally licensed all the hospitals in the US. semimojo: Yeah, yeah, the bogeyman did it, and if you don't believe in the bogeyman you must be in on the conspiracy. Of course it is, only you and the CDC claim it isn't. We'll, me, the CDC, and 99% of the public health experts in the world. You, on the other hand, have a relatively tiny handful of fringe characters, like Kirsch who has zero medical training or background, most of whom are making money from their contrarian positions. ransomnote: You sound like the MSM saying there was zero evidence of cheating in the 2020 election. You're on repeat, using their tactic even though most FReepers are awake. You still want to deceive those last few. Still falsely sneering 'grifters' when in fact working against the medical coup means abuse and legal problems. You're still pretending Kirsch the tech Billionaire thought anti-covid was a money making avenue. Well, to be fair, you don't believe it yourself but you want others to believe it. No, the reason why you say that is because the VAERS data exposes those in our government conducting biowarfare on the public. semimojo: LOL. The all-powerful CDC, which can manipulate the entire world's healthcare systems to perpetrate it's hoax, can't control and massage the information in a database it solicits and maintains. ransomnote: For those reading along, if any, semimojo is pretending the CDC did not exceed its authority compel masking and lockdowns. yeah, semimojo has been gone for two years. Semi also doesn't know the CDC receives private funding from Bill Gates through the CDC's 501c3, and that Bill Gates owns the World Health Organization - that organization treats Bill Gates like a head of state. semimojo: Instead, brave, intrepid patriots are the only ones who “really” know what the data represent. Do you ever stop to think about the implications of these conspiracy theories? ransomnote: I have done so much more than 'stope and think'. I have conducted a great deal of research and learned from experts. I studied how the CDC/NIH/FDA was formally weaponized around 1993 so they've had 30 years to lay down their strategy to destroy us. Dr. Josh Guetzkow went through the laborious process of identifying normal 'background levels' of symptoms following Covid 'vaccination' and comparing them to those same symptoms experienced after Covid 'vaccination'. semimojo: He did no such thing. He compared Covid vaccines to previous adverse event reporting for other vaccines. This might have some validity if he could show previous event reporting system had the same level of participation and people were exactly as likely to report an event for another vaccine as for Covid. Of course he can't do that. You've stumbled upon a good approach - identifying the background level of events in the unvaccinated and comparing it to the vaccinated - but Guetzkow doesn't even attempt this, let alone succeed. You seem to think that if you post enough mis-analysis of adverse event data the sheer volume will overcome the underlying fatal flaws in these self-reporting systems. ransomnote: Here's your repetitive strategy again. Claim no proof exists except that which you specify. Read the Acip report. Contend with Steve Kirsch's team of experts and disprove their Bradford-Hill criteria and win 1 million dollars. I know you can't and won't. Hey while you guys are busy playing the game, why not tell us all how Dr. Malone and Steve Kirsch end up being 'grifters' for speaking out against the lies and damage the CDC/NIH/FDA and your kind are spreading? You mean the Dr. Malone who believes the mRNA vaccine are safe and effective? So much so he and Peter Nevarro penned an op-ed in the Washington Times advocating giving them to our most vulnerable, highest risk population? Of course, he doesn't advertise that position now that he's a media darling and making money from his Substack subscribers who would never stand for that stance. As for Kirsch, as we know, once they've made money what many rich people really crave is attention. ransomnote: Dr. Malone trusted the medical experts who picked up his discoveries so Dr. Malone got the vaccine before he realized it was toxic and damaging. He was retired and living his life happilyl until deceived into getting the "Covid Vaccine". Now people like you falsely accuse him of coming out of retirement and getting a 'vaccinatioin' he regrets to warn others in order to make mystery money that comes from nowhere - your kind call him a grifter for taking the abuse he's getting. Kirsch uses his money to spread the word to protect the public from the 'vaccine'. He attends the meetings with CDC advisory panels, identifies by name the officials abusing us and calls them out, offering to debate them (his team versus theirs) to help the public shake off the medical bioweapons and the tyranny in place to support it. And you can't trash his reputaion without facts enough. As FReepers slowely awakened to the dangers of the vax, you keep telling them to go back to sleep. Say if you want 1 million dollars, then debate STeve Kirsch and his team on the hard evidence they gathered. semimojo: It isn't the evidence that's wrong, it's the interpretation. ransomnote: Then debate the interpretation. That's what the 1 million dollars is for. The CDC/NIH/FDA won't bring their experts to debate Kirsch's team because they would lose using industry standard methodology to determine causality. I like it when you expose your weasel reasoning "isn't the evidence that's wrong" because it warns FReepers to avoid you and your kind. Yes, that's your idea of 'grifters' I guess; men who will pay government agents 1 million dollars just to debate the scientific merits behind the ghastly vaccines being forced upon the public. semimojo: Actually, that's a great indication of a grift. Serious people interested in scientific truth don't do public spectacle “debates” with entirely unqualified showmen like Kirsch. They do honest research, have it reviewed by peers, and publish it where the scientific community can evaluate and critique it. They don't do carnival side shows. ransomnote: So you're still pretending that nothing has changed and the CDC still serves the public interest? Our CDC is weaponized and lording it over the public, grabbing power and dictating lockdowns? You really support the CDC's abuses so they are just invisible to you and your 'target' is one of the few men calling out the CDC and exposing their crimes. That was your effort to dismiss the documented information in VAERS which exposes the toxic 'vaccines'. semimojo: No, VAERS says there more events self-reported after Covid vaccinations than after tetanus. Full stop. You take that uncontested fact and make a gigantic rhetorical leap to toxicity. I asked: Are those who have gotten the vaccines statistically more likely to have these events? If you can't answer that question, with supporting evidence, you can't credibly say the vaccines are harmful. ransomnote: WHy ignore standard Bradford-Hill criteria for causality acceptable to scientists for other purposes, but not for 'Covid vaccines'? You keep ignoring all the research by experts pinning down the damage done in reproducible terms and pretending there's only one way to prove this disasterous Covid 'vaccine' hoax. Yes, those who have gotten the vaccines are statistically more likely to have these events (e.g., die). I and many have answered that question… semimojo: Interesting. VAERS and the other adverse event reporting systems don't have any data on the unvaccinated population yet you claim to have done a statistical analysis of events in vaccinated vs. unvaccinated. Please provide your analysis and the sources of the data. ransomnote: *eyeroll* You really are a waste of time. You're ignoring evidence and asking for evidence. What a devious waste of time you are. | 
