Right now, we have no conditions that would permit the military to take over. The election mess is not sufficient. Open warfare or a foreign occupying force within DC would be sufficient.
I don't know where declassification stands.
There is a misunderstand of Durham's role. He won't issue a report. He will issue indictments.
I forgot to ask you about the weight carried by POTUS, more times than a few, 1) announcing an Act of War, by China, [foreign] and 2) eventually saying it was also used [domestically] to steal an election, “a coup”, 3) declaring that he considered himself a Wartime POTUS, and 4) stating the attack was greater than Pearl Harbor and the WTC, and 5) declaring there will be Reparations for China. [Billion$s]
The ground plowed above seems to have laid the presidential action that is purported to be based on MIL evidence, enough to convincingly earn the support of MIL leaders, to recommend and agree to initiate the Intel Plan, and Trump’s own signed and sealed executive enactments to defend the Republic, all said to be operational, and now we see miraculous advances in heretofore enemy held federal departments and some state and federal courts, etc.
( PS: I’m reading that US MIL Intel capabilities are a phenomenal 40 years ahead of any other known intelligence gathering capability in the world.)
Thanks. ❤
Your first questions make sense. You need a condition of war to execute the Laws of War. Only then do we go beyond “Who’s on First.” Attempting to execute the Laws of War in a situation where it isn’t obvious that there is war only divides the citizenry and the military, making it impossible for them to accept the situation and act upon it.
Right now, we have no conditions that would permit the military to take over. The election mess is not sufficient. Open warfare or a foreign occupying force within DC would be sufficient.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Publius, I can’t remember if you said you have read Patel Patriot’s Devolution series or not. If you have not, would you consider doing so? His series gives ample evidence for the use of the military in my non-scholarly understanding, I have read all of his articles.
And here is a link to Majic Eyes Qnly, Law of War series. Some of the videos explains the Law of War manual from 2015 and how it relates to current events, and why it provides for military intervention. I haven’t seen all his videos by any means, just some.
https://rumble.com/c/MAJICEYESQNLY?sort=views
“ Right now, we have no conditions that would permit the military to take over. The election mess is not sufficient. Open warfare or a foreign occupying force within DC would be sufficient.”
I think you’re missing a very important point:
If it’s known/proven that there was a foreign element to the election fraud, then the case is clear that it’s an act of war, and we don’t have a legitimate government. In that event, the military could absolutely take over to protect the country from the foreigners. It’s what they do when you think about it.
Think of it this way, if say China hacked our election systems and was able to make it look like their guy wins when he didn’t, there is nothing unconstitutional about righting that wrong. There is no functional difference between invading and seizing Washington DC with your military in planes and tanks, and doing the same via computer manipulation. The military is the only way.
Mark