Yet, like an earthquake, you can derive energy released, and pin-point the the source location in 3 dimensions.
Or, ripples from a stone tossed into a pond.
What you can’t do is determine what caused the earthquake or what kind of stone was tossed.
Unless you are the cause or you tossed the stone.
In perspective (50 foot view), baggie is correct.
the 50 foot view is more detailed and can’t be changed by theoretical mathematics.
If High’s (sp?) stuff is “bunk” then AI market analysis and trading programs would have had short shrift in the economic environment.
I’ll grant that Cliff does a crappy job himself getting the point across, but one of the biggest “tells” in his favor was the admission that the information return and accuracy declined dramatically with the introduction of heavy censorship.