Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DJ Frisat
...already rejected Sarah Palin's claim...

Unlike Sarah Palin, Kyle Rittenhouse isn't a "public figure" as per the standard of the notorious New York Times vs. Sullivan ruling.

The Covington High School kids were able to successfully sue CNN and the Wash Compost for liable, based upon the "public figure" rule. Hopefully Kyle Rittenhouse can do the same with Whoopi Goldberg and Cenk Uygur.

23 posted on 02/22/2022 7:14:08 AM PST by LuxAerterna (/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: LuxAerterna

Several courts have held that you can become an “involuntary public figure” for purposes of Sullivan as the result of publicity, even though you did not want or invite the public attention.


31 posted on 02/22/2022 7:33:39 AM PST by Bubba_Leroy (Dementia Joe is Not My President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: LuxAerterna
Unlike Sarah Palin, Kyle Rittenhouse isn't a "public figure" as per the standard of the notorious New York Times vs. Sullivan ruling.

He's busy making himself a public figure

32 posted on 02/22/2022 7:37:10 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: LuxAerterna

Rittenhouse absolutely is a public figure.

Public figures also include individuals who have achieved pervasive fame or notoriety. A person can even become an “involuntary public figure” as the result of publicity, even though that person did not want or invite the public attention.

Read Gertz v. Welch, Time v. Hill and Dameron v. Washington Magazine.


40 posted on 02/23/2022 6:38:54 AM PST by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson