I looked through much of what you posted, but it’s almost as painful as listening to Jordan Rather himself. Plenty of clutter, no detectable substance.
All noise, no signal, as Bannon would put it.
LJ, since you seem quite opinionated on this general subject, could you summarize the brief, specific points which illustrate how Sather is credible on anything, and how Lin Wood is not? If any exist? For the sake of, and so we may profit from deductive reasoning.
Mark
If you haven’t been paying attention to Lin Wood, I can’t help you.