Posted on 01/25/2022 9:42:07 AM PST by ransomnote
[H/T HoneysuckleTN]
2022-01532.pdf (federalregister.gov)
"https://t.co/dJ5VG4CE6m pic.twitter.com/yzaZy50UDN— Disclose.tv (@disclosetv) January 25, 2022
The big Wall Street financial services firms are keeping it in place thus far.
My employer, a multi-national bank with hundreds of billions in assets and far more than that under management dropped our vaccine mandate when it went to the USSC and became clear it wasn't going to survive.
That and about 50% of IT refused to get the jab and we're already so grossly understaffed they cannot afford to lose a single one of us at this point.
actually the president has all sorts of emergency powers like the power to go to war without congress approval in an emergency.
The president has no explicit power to go to war without Congressional approval. Certainly it’s been done, and they’ve gotten away with it to one degree or another, but they have no actual authority to do that.
But they are still going to push it for a regular OSHA requirement.
The War Powers Resolution of 1973 (also known as the War Powers Act) “is a congressional resolution designed to limit the U.S. president’s ability to initiate or escalate military actions abroad.” As part of our system of governmental “checks and balances,” the law aims to check the executive branch’s power when committing U.S. military forces to an armed conflict without the consent of the U.S. Congress. It stipulates the president must notify Congress within 48 hours of military action and prohibits armed forces from remaining for more than 60 days.
So yeah.. he can for up to 60 days.
For you, you left on a very high note!
The low note are these evil BigPharma owned hospitals, forcing this on the heroes who worked UNVACCINATED, through out this entire ScamDemIc.
God bless you!
Wow,
I had a conversation with a supposed medial professional asking about a medical exemption and didn’t even complete the question before receiving an emphatic one word answer. NO.
Wanna take a guess who’s out of the running as my new primary care physician?
One of my best friends is a battalion chief. He is also a high level FEMA person. He is being forcibly retired in three weeks for not being vaxxed. Of course, he had a documented case of Covid and has had the antibody tests that show he has natural immunity that are accepted for international travel.
At this point it has become very obvious that natural immunity gives superior protection as compared to the faux “vaccines”. But it has now morphed into the common cold, and just because you had a cold last year does not mean that you will not get it again this year.
My wife and I had what we assumed was Delta after her fully vaxxed sister and her husband came up last June and stayed with us for a few days hacking, sniffling, and looking crappy. Neither of them have normal personal hygiene boundaries. One example, he was licking mashed potatoes off the serving spoon and stuck it back in the bowl. She constantly does equally disgusting stuff like licking the knife and then sticking it back in the jar of jam for her next roll.
They were having a Delta outbreak on the base where he is a wing commander. When they got back they both tested positive. She called us and suggested that we gave it to them. A day or two later we had symptoms ourselves which persisted for a couple of weeks. I thought that we were probably immune after that but we both ended up with cold like symptoms his winter that might have been Omicron.
“So yeah.. he can for up to 60 days.”
No, not really. That act was in fact designed to do just the opposite, trying to stop the President from doing end runs around the Constitutional requirement for Congress to declare war, as had previously happened in Korea and Vietnam, when the Presidents called them “police actions” or “peacekeeping missions”.
If you read the text of the act, there is not one word that cedes Congress’ consitutional power to declare wars to the President, not even for a temporary period, and in fact, the act explicitly reinforced that this was a power reserved to Congress alone in section 1541.a:
“(c) Presidential executive power as Commander-in-Chief; limitation
The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to (1) a declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization, or (3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.”
So as you see, the only “emergency” that act authorized the President to act upon without prior Congressional approval is specified in part 3, which is limited to defense against an attack, which is a power the President already had since the Constitution actually mandates that the President defend the country as Commander-in-Chief. No new powers at all were given to the President by this act, only more specific limitations and regulations on his existing powers.
It was struck down in Federal Court in Texas.
It was struck down in Federal Court in Texas.
It also loss in 5th Circuit court of Appeals.
All by design
They must have gotten the heads up they are going to lose the Supreme Court.
They would not be doing this unless they knew they are about to lose.
So withdraw go back to step 1 and try a legal way to force it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.