In just a few hours, my short tweet on myocarditis Google search rates went viral. Here's the reason why search rates skyrocketed (hint: it's because cases skyrocketed).
 |
|
Posted on 01/14/2022 9:39:23 PM PST by ransomnote
|
|
I wrote this Tweet and it blew up really fast: over 100,000 views in the first 3 hours:
Of course, there were many people who wrote something to the effect of “Um. Those are Google searches. That means people searching about it. It doesn't mean anything.”
Really?!? Nothing?!? I disagree. I think it does mean something. It confirms every other piece of data I’ve seen.
A critical thinker might ask the question, “Why would people suddenly start searching about myocarditis shortly after the vaccines rolled out and not before?”
Vaccine-induced myocarditis started making headlines starting around June 14, 2021, but it wasn’t officially confirmed even then. So that doesn’t explain the increase before that time.
The answer seems obvious: clearly, interest in the topic increased a lot shortly after the vaccines rolled out. Is there a different explanation that is more likely?
Here are some of the reasons why the interest in myocarditis went up so much:
VAERS data shows that the rates of myocarditis caused by the vaccine are far greater than the rates caused by COVID (see VaccineEssentials slide 48). According to this CDC MMWR report, “During 2020, the number of myocarditis inpatient encounters (4,560) was 42.3% higher than that during 2019 (3,205).” That’s why the bars in 2019 and 2020 below are about the same height. The incidence rate caused by the vaccine is way higher than for COVID (and it wasn’t caused by “over reporting” as I’ve explained many times before). There is no other way to explain this. This chart is from a published paper by Jessica Rose that was unethically retracted by the journal publisher because it goes against the narrative. If anyone wants to debate Jessica on this, bring it on! So you are never ever supposed to see this chart below. Nobody in mainstream medicine wants to talk about it either.
UK data shows the rates of myocarditis increased after the vaccines (see VaccineEssentials slide 54).
All of the cardiologists (people like Peter McCullough) I’ve talked to have confirmed that the rates of myocarditis have gone up after the vaccines have rolled out compared to pre-vaccine. Do you know of any cardiologists who claimed myocarditis cases went down after the vaccines rolled out?
Young kids seem to be getting myocarditis regularly now whereas you’d pretty much never see these cases before the vaccines rolled out (see VaccineEssentials slide 50)
At one private school near where I live, the rate of myocarditis after the vaccine roll out was greater than 1 in 100 teenage boys, which of course is far greater than the rate from COVID.
The CDC doesn’t want to talk about vaccine-caused myocarditis as this story about the tragic death of 26-year-old Joseph Keating. Nobody wants to touch it.
I’d love to get an explanation of this from mainstream medical doctors, but they refuse to talk to me because I don’t believe the vaccines are safe.
Scientists are always looking to discover which hypothesis better fits the data that is observed.
Having multiple data points gives higher confidence in the result. If 10 data points are consistent with a hypothesis, that makes it more likely that that hypothesis is the correct one.
In the current case, all the data I’m aware of is consistent with the hypothesis that the vaccines are super dangerous and doesn't comport at all with their hypothesis that the vaccines are perfectly safe.
If anyone would like to show me evidence of how the actual myocarditis rates plummeted after the vaccine rollout, please let me know and I’ll list that here.
Or if you have a better explanation of why the interest in myocarditis went up after the vaccine rollout, please let me know in the comments.
PING
People starved for truth and facts by a corrupt media. Media increasingly a fantasy world of unreality. They’re about selling advertising to deep pockets like Pfizer. It’s why the global elitists are trying to shut the truth out of social media.
More and more is coming out on this criminal attack on humanity every day and I think we’re about to see many people who have been jabbed become very irate and upset that they’ve been had and subjected to all these bad things.
I firmly believe this untested and unwarranted rollout will go down in history, and not in a good way. Anyone still pushing this poison is, quite simply, evil.
Hear, hear!!
THIS IS WHY THE TRADITIONAL TESTING PERIOD FORCA NEW VACCINE WAS ABOUT 10 YEARS!
THIS IS WHY MODERNA SAID 97% OF ALL NEW VACCINES FAIL TO COME TO MARKET DUE TO ISSUES DISCOVERED IN PHASE 2 AND PHASE 3 TESTING.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3880613/posts
This link is an article posted on FR from mid-2020 which links myocarditis with Covid 19. This was well before vaccines. Thus, the Google chart is not necessarily what is represented.
Don’t come after me. I have not been vaccinated and I am not an apologist for vaccines. I do believe that the subject needs honest assessments.
this crap minted at least nine new billionaires
they never would gave existed going the normal testing route because it would have never gotten approval
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled The stunning increase in myocarditis rates after the vaccines rolled out, the_Watchman wrote: |
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3880613/posts This link is an article posted on FR from mid-2020 which links myocarditis with Covid 19. This was well before vaccines. Thus, the Google chart is not necessarily what is represented. Don’t come after me. I have not been vaccinated and I am not an apologist for vaccines. I do believe that the subject needs honest assessments. |
The article is from September of 2020.
I don't think this 'vaccine' was the CDC's 'first rodeo.' They've been doing other things to harm human health for years.
The vaccine already existed and I believe those conducting biowarfare against us were already distributing it through other medical means. The 'vaccine' already existed, but they could have relied on other means as well (e.g., Graphene Oxide in adjuvant) to falsely link Covid to myocarditis to give their bioweapon 'cover'. That way, the myo would look like it started before the 'vaccine' when there was no natural cause for it to do so.
I seem to recall a newsworthy event some time age where Pfizer put a myocarditis prevention additive into their vaccine.
soon everyone will know someone who has vax adverse reactions
everyone vaxxed person in my family later got covid
people are beginning to realize that they have been deceived
p
https://www.fda.gov/media/153447/download
Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee Meeting
October 26, 2021
FDA Briefing Document
EUA amendment request for Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine for use in children 5 through 11 years of age
They added Tris aka Tromethamine to the pediatric dose for 5-11 y/o as a ostensibly as stabilizing agent.
The FRoctors on that thread didn’t seem to think myocarditis from covid was common or serious.
IMO, whether Covid causes myocarditis is not the issue - you cannot choose to catch covid. You can choose to take this shot.
The amount of heart attacks and heart issues happening in young health people is not normal by any stretch: https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3988541/posts?page=357#357
outstanding info
They switched out one buffering solution for another, a common lab solution called TRIS. TRIS just happens to also be used to treat stroke patients. So it’s not exactly something for myocarditis, but it does have to do with reducing the damage of blood clotting disorders.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.