Posted on 01/02/2022 11:11:59 AM PST by bitt
In her tweet on New Year’s Eve, Hillary Clinton shared an old photo of herself. The photo is several years old – yet she says she is “looking ahead” to 2022.
The caption read: “Looking ahead to 2022. Wishing you a happy, healthy, and fabulous New Year.”
The surprising image she chose to share, was one that was posted in a 2016 montage of Hillary Clinton versus Donald Trump — a fluff piece for Hillary at the time she was running against him for President of the United States. It was published in 2016, almost six years old.
Hillary has resurfaced recently, namely with her ‘Masterclass’, where she read to acceptance speech she had prepared, but never got a chance to give that speech. Despite it being five years since the loss, it seems evident that she still hasn’t been able to come to grips with her stunning defeat and some suggest that she’s preparing for another run in 2024, having dropped several cryptic messages in the last several weeks — this tweet being the latest.
(Excerpt) Read more at conservativefighters.co ...
All very funny until you start thinking about the 2024 primary season.
Awful as she is, Clinton would beat the incompetent incumbent (that would be Harris) easily.
Cankles or Cackles. What was that saying about treachery beating inexperience?
she claims to weigh 130 lbs.
Which half?
bwahaha! The lower half i guess.
She obviously got Sharon Stone to stand in for her.
I thought the same thing. It's an odd choice. Publishing a picture like this just reminds people of how ... well, I want to be a gentleman ... "not young and not healthy" she looks now.
I’m confused. Wouldn’t a new photo of Hillary be old?
Looks like from ‘93 campaign.
Maybe on the moon where there’s no gravity.
“several” years old? Looks more like going back to when she was First Lady.
That was from her trip to South Africa as Secretary of State.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9xclUSMlmA
Looking ahead from 20 years back.
GMTA
LOL, that never gets old!
she claims to weigh 130 lbs.
—
Maybe she meant 130 kg.
100% chance that is NOT her - from any decade. That is not her profile.
My thought exactly.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.