Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: GingisK
”A TV without a microphone cannot listen in.”

I wouldn’t state this as an absolute. I’d say that such a set is less likely to ‘listen’, but it can be done. A conventional ‘loudspeaker’ - the device historically used to play audio in televisions, radios, cassette players, etc. - can also be used as an input device, aka a microphone. This may also be the case with newer audio transducer types, but I’m only talking about speakers.

For this to work efficiently, it would require the set to be designed, or modified, to function in a bidirectional mode.

Never say never! 😉

202 posted on 12/31/2021 6:29:06 AM PST by DJ Frisat (My tag line, optionally printed after the name on my post…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]


To: DJ Frisat

My TV does not have uplink capability.


204 posted on 12/31/2021 6:34:45 AM PST by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]

To: DJ Frisat
It has an antenna.

A BURST of info being transmitted from it would never be noticed at all by those sitting in front of it.

heck, the early closed caption wording was encoded in the non-visable portion of the tv signal.


The closed captioning system was successfully encoded and broadcast in 1973 with the cooperation of PBS station WETA.[2] 
As a result of these tests, the FCC in 1976 set aside line 21 for the transmission of closed captions. 
 
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Closed_captioning#Technical_development_of_closed_captioning
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EIA-608
 
 

209 posted on 12/31/2021 7:30:30 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson