I have actually heard better outcomes from J & J people
Is this just string arming for Pfizer to get more $$$$?
My first thought...Next we will hear that if you had the J&J, you must get a booster and it MUST be Moderna or Pfizer and you will no longer be considered fully vaccinated until you get the booster.
Been saying this for close to 2 years. Why would you get a jab from a company that multiple class action lawsuits when almost 90% of their products are defective? THey have no business being in the vaxx industry.
Sure glad I’m already on blood thinners!
I have actually heard better outcomes from J & J people
Is this just string arming for Pfizer to get more $$$$?
Sounds like it. It’s all over MSLYINGMedia....
Yeah it seems like Pfizer and Moderna actually have many more instances of these side effects, but somehow the regulators only care about J&J.
They seem to be the dominant crime family.
in my opinion, yes. It is my understanding that J&J is more traditional and could lead to long term protection, where the others give a shorter term benefit, if at all. I hope someone will correct me if my understanding is incorrect.