[DugwayDuke]

fireman15 wrote: “This is likely a bit above your comprehension level, but take a look at the statement from CDC Director Rochelle P. Walensky in July. In the statement she mentions vaccinated people transmitting the virus to others repeatedly.”

So, according to your vast medical experience a vaccine must be 100% effective in preventing illnesses? If 100% effectiveness is the standard, then there are no vaccines since no vaccine is 100% effective.

[SoConPubbie]

So, according to your vast medical experience a vaccine must be 100% effective in preventing illnesses? If 100% effectiveness is the standard, then there are no vaccines since no vaccine is 100% effective.

Get back to us when your preferred method(Clot-Shot "Vaccines") of fixing/solving/curing this COVID-19 "crisis" is more than 50% effective at stopping the spread of the disease, keeping those "vaccinated" from getting the disease, and is no longer killing thousands of patients that have been "treated" with this Clot-Shot.

Then, and only then, you might have a point.

[cgbg]

If the Polio vaccine worked like the Covid vaccines, almost everyone who posts here would have been stricken with polio.

[bagster]

So, according to your vast medical experience a vaccine must be 100% effective in preventing illnesses? If 100% effectiveness is the standard, then there are no vaccines since no vaccine is 100% effective.

It would be nice if they didn't kill people. We can start there. We already know they don't work.

#UnsafeAndIneffective

[Fury]

If 100% effectiveness is the standard, then there are no vaccines since no vaccine is 100% effective.

I believe the rabies vaccine if not 100% effective is very close - it has to be as people will die once symptoms develop.

[Triple]

100 % effective is a bs strawman argument.

The delta an omicron variants probably break through the mRNA jabs 50% of the time 6 weeks past the most recent booster. That is ineffective.