[SoConPubbie]

So, according to your vast medical experience a vaccine must be 100% effective in preventing illnesses? If 100% effectiveness is the standard, then there are no vaccines since no vaccine is 100% effective.

Get back to us when your preferred method(Clot-Shot "Vaccines") of fixing/solving/curing this COVID-19 "crisis" is more than 50% effective at stopping the spread of the disease, keeping those "vaccinated" from getting the disease, and is no longer killing thousands of patients that have been "treated" with this Clot-Shot.

Then, and only then, you might have a point.

[DugwayDuke]

SoConPubbie wrote: “Get back to us when your preferred method(Clot-Shot “Vaccines”) of fixing/solving/curing this COVID-19 “crisis” is more than 50% effective at stopping the spread of the disease, keeping those “vaccinated” from getting the disease, and is no longer killing thousands of patients that have been “treated” with this Clot-Shot.”

What difference would that make? The anti-vaxxers were anti-vaxxers when the vaccines were 95% effective. There is no evidence that the vaccines have killed anyone. VARES isn’t proof. Correlation isn’t causation.