Every Israeli pub should report/list the home addresses of each and every Iranian political and religious leader with even the slightest responsibility for this Iranian threat (e.g., ignore bureaucratic drones who just pass the paper). Include family members as secondaries so that the primary “targets” realize that if they are not vaporized in the first strike, the 2nd will get them hiding out with their cousins.
Ditto on military, down to the 1st lieutenants.
Make it personal.
Just for a giggle post another list of mistresses — just in case the obliteration of their gene pool didn’t get them on the 1st or 2nd round.
At the very least, it will drive down the property values of their residences — hurt them in the pocket, too.
LOL
Just because Bennet/Lapide are wimps doesn’t mean Israeli military won’t take out Iranian military and its pedophile mullah rulers.
Run along, dearie. Was downing that Russian passenger jet an example of your prowess. Your policemen are mighty handy with a 12 gauge when it comes to peaceful protesters or women daring to show their faces.
Israel should respond in kind. Except just show all of Iran.
Well, alrighty.
Ping.
A long time ago, the US military published LD-50-30 radiation levels. This was the amount of different kinds of radiation (Lethal Dose) that would kill 50% of an exposed population within 30 days. That is how the military calculated the effect of nuclear weapons. After the two Japanese bombs were detonated there were lots of long term studies done to see just how lethal nuclear weapons were.
The Civil Defense Department came up with plans for local and private bomb shelters and ways that the public could best survive an nuclear attack. What can be done to dramatically reduce the LD-50-30 deaths is not all that extreme: below ground level radiation shielding during the blast, staying put and not getting exposed to fall out for a few days, avoiding radioactive “hot spots” makes a world of difference.
The real destruction today from a Nuclear bomb or even a dirty bomb is the economic and disruptive effect of clean-up. Since I have been involved with a plutonium release, I have some first hand knowledge of clean-up procedures.
What I can say is the cost and disruption are a function of how “crazy” you want to be or the public is. There are three types of nuclear radiation. Alpha particles (like from plutonium) that can be stopped by a piece of toilet paper or a layer of cheap paint are the first. If you have to separate the alpha emitting particles then chipping the paint and put it in drums is expensive and time consuming. If you are just willing to live with it under the paint, it will not hurt folks and can be cheaply dealt with.
Beta particles, or electrons can be stopped by just a little bit of material. So hot spots can be covered with concrete or asphalt as a relatively easy fix.
Gamma particles require mass for shielding and are the most difficult to deal with.
The best way to deal with beta and gamma particles is to just hose down the area and “flush” the stuff to a river or out to the ocean. Yes, it will harm the environment and yes it will be very hard to clean up once it has been diluted, but it is cheap and makes a location “livable” again relatively quickly. Besides, it wasn't the folks doing the clean up that initially created and released all the radiation. Just my opinion based on some limited experience.
They reckon without God and choose to forget the Six Day War.
