There is an “archive” link at the bottom of the post - Dr. Homer has plenty more good articles of interest.
******************
I have no doubt the Left wants this and is actively working on it. I'd even wager they've already developed it and are waiting on the right moment to introduce it.
The chicoms already have a social credit score so the model is there to adopt, copy and modify.
From the article:
“Why the push for boosters?”
Answer:
“Pfizer reported that earnings and sales more than doubled in the past quarter, and it raised its outlook for results the full year, thanks greatly to its Covid-19 vaccine.
The company reported adjusted earnings of $7.7 billion, up 133% from a year earlier. Revenue soared to $24.1 billion, up 134%. Both easily cleared results forecast by analysts.
The vaccine business alone was responsible for more than 60% of the company’s sales, as vaccine revenue rose to $14.6 billion from only $1.7 billion a year earlier. The company said its Covid vaccine sales accounted for $13 billion of that revenue. Revenue outside of its Covid vaccine business was up a far more modest 7%.”
If the juice comes from the same vial, it should be called a redo not a booster.
Big pharma can’t be truthful about anything.
I think that was the plan and some countries are closer to that than others but I think it will fail here, at least for now.
There has been NO remake, even under EUA, for any “booster” to be anything else other than another shot of the genetic snipped segment of S-Protein (Spike protein only— no complete virion content from the actual full virus) in the “booster”.
Which is why the “booster” is ineffective in preventing the Delta variant in the Spike protein (a variant that makes the virus more infectious) and likely any other variant including Omicron. Omicron— a coronavirus S protein of its own with a virus that has clearly mutated to less of a deadly threat.
We must STOP this now— omicron is clearly not a threat, but just the promoted newest mutation. The way of all viruses is to mutate for greater spread and less deadly (not kill the host that spreads the virus)— this is way of all viruses.
The reaction here to continue the RUSE— is purely political and driving the CONTROL politics of Leftist dems who have to have this as the MEANS to steal another election by false “health scare” and preserving “mail in ballots” that cannot be verified to each VOTER. Mail in ballots are BALLOT BOX STUFFERS.
Therefore, in simple language, the injection is a biannual injection. The “two doses” of the mRNA inoculations is merely the opening gambit in the marketing. Twice a year given that this concoction's effect “wanes.”
Waiting for the next marketing ploy to drop.
And if people don’t have smart phones, what’s next? Tattoos? They’re going to be out of luck with me - no smart phone - post guards at my front and back doors? No doubt they have plans for that eventuality.
As someone who has recently had organ transplant surgery, I take drugs to suppress my immune system so as not to cause my new liver to be rejected.
I have had three shots of Moderna already, and I am not planning on getting a fourth.
Anti-rejection meds vs. immune system-boosting vaccine?
This feels like a tug-of-war I’m not sure I want to participate in.
From the article: “We still have a choice. We can choose to go down this road of boosters without knowing where the road will lead, or we can recognize that vaccination will not eradicate this virus, no matter how many boosters we take. If boosters will not eradicate SARS-CoV-2, there must be another reason to inject the world with limitless mRNA sequences.”
Natural immunity also wanes with time. What’s his next fearmongering conspiracy theory?
The virus, and even more so the vaccine, is the biggest most blatant hoax in the history of civilization
we have to find out what the long term effects are by injecting the entire population
Offer all the boosters you want. Mandate NONE.