You haven’t even come close to the negligence prerequisite. Third party due diligence is well established precedence. All you hypothetical charges rely on the proof of negligence. You must prove without the shadow of a doubt he was legally and I will point to the definition again that he didn’t take reasonable care in his actions. He is innocent until the DA proves him guilty of negligence. He does have proof of exactly the opposite that he had a reasonable expectation that the weapon that was handed to him a cold gun. He has reasonable expectation that the armor and the director both did their due diligence and verified that the prop was a cold gun. He again had reasonable expectation that when the verbal and public call or cold gun on set is done that the prop was indeed a cold gun. The DA must prove that he didn’t take reasonable care in his actions when he was also being instructed on those actions performing a professional task under directions from amother staff member. Come on Mr conservative innocent until proven guilty right. Prove he lacked the reasonable care. He didn’t have the legal responsibility to certify that weapon as cold. He said as much in his interview he is right. He also doesn’t expect to be charged his very expensive and much better attorney that you came to the same conclusion there is little to no way to prove negligence willful or not. Due diligence was done on multiple levels. I love America innocent until the states struggles to prove you guilty. A very high bar indeed and one every American should be happy for. Trying to convince 12 people that after all those steps and due diligence was taken that someone not legally responsible for,tasked with nor skilled with should second guess their professional armor and director on set is a VERY high bar to reach and you need to then prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he didn’t take the reasonable care someone in his shoes would take. Good luck with that.
You must prove without the shadow of a doubt...
Hogwash. Thats a standard for willfull homicide, murder. Not negligent homicide.
Sure, he is innocent until found guilty - in a courtroom. In the public, he is whatever conclusion you come to based on what you see and here. In this case Alec has strung himself up two or three time already.
First, please, more commas and paragraphs! I am not a grammar nazi or anything, but your posts are hard to read due to these lacks.
Second, I read in England an armorer has to have a special license, obtained after special training, to handle firearms for filming and plays.
This should be an absolute prerequisite in the US! Putting a young woman who is unsure of her abilities with firearms in was a Really Stupid Idea!