Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Magnum44

“Balwin handled the gun without knowing the state of the gun (loaded/unloaded) knowing it WAS a real gun and COULD kill someone. He then went on to cock hammer/release hammer/pull trigger (pick whatever you like) while the gun was pointed at the chest of the dead victim, knowing it WAS a real gun and COULD kill someone. That is the very definition of negligence.”

On a movie set all that is the responsibility of the armor that has been held in court on a number of occasions I’m sorry you can’t understand that. He was handed a certified cold gun. He has no legal responsibility to double check that from the armor frankly he lacks the skills to do so and the law is on his side on that he can simply say I was handed a certified cold gun by my licenced armor and it was declared cold.

Further he was under active instructions on where to point that declared cold gun and to.manipulate the mechanisms again as an actor following instructions he is under guidance. I will up my bet to a grand I’m not a poor I spend more on craps in a day. He won’t be charged let alone convicted.


44 posted on 12/03/2021 9:40:39 AM PST by JD_UTDallas ("Veni Vidi Vici" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: JD_UTDallas
Sure. Whatever. Find the exception for movie sets in the law and show me please. Everything you cite might apply to a civil case. It has very little bearing compared to law in a criminal case.

Personally, I think he will be charged and likely convicted. Unfortunately, like Smollett we will have to wait three or four years for this process to occur.

45 posted on 12/03/2021 9:43:52 AM PST by Magnum44 (...against all enemies, foreign and domestic...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson