[Farcesensitive]

“Just how many of these “exceptions” are too many? (How many of them ARE there, for that matter?) Do each of them have equal import? If not, then which ones carry the most weight, and why? Is each exception assigned a numerical value, so that one can calculate a person’s Trannie Suspect Score? By what criteria does a person under examination pass or fail?

Inquiring minds want to know.”

---

I’m not an inquiring mind as far as this subject goes.
Unless it seems glaringly obvious I don’t even bother to think about whether some random person is a trannie.

My only point was that too many people make too much of an issue over trends that are not absolute but that if you see Bruce Jenner you can probably notice he isn’t an actual female in spite of adopting s girl’s name and dressing up like one.

I’m more on your side than the trannie hunters who see them everywhere any time a person is not the ultimate archetype of male or female.

I was trying to stake out a middle ground everyone could agree on and avoid trying to make some kind of point system people could be rated on for something that is far too complex for such a thing that’s why I left it at “too many”.

[grey_whiskers]

Speaking of suspect, check out this hilarious Pelosi satire.

1 minute long.

https://rumble.com/vosomn-privilege-scrub.html

[NetAddicted]

Follow up later.

[17strings]

I’m more on your side than the trannie hunters who see them everywhere any time a person is not the ultimate archetype of male or female.

---

Ah, okay! I wondered, given your phrasing. I really think this whole subject (suspiciously looking at people’s non-archetypical male or female attributes) is only even a thing at all right now because of certain social media influencers with large numbers of impressionable followers, who imagine they see trannies behind every blade of grass and love to point out their “discoveries”. A bit of that seems to unfortunately rear its ugly head from time to time on these threads.