Election Wizard
@ElectionWiz
· 1h
CNBC POLL:
Which party would you prefer to control Congress:
44% - Republicans
34% - Democrats
Police cars revolving light “In the past 20 years, CNBC and NBC surveys have never registered a double-digit Republican advantage on congressional preference...”
https://cnb.cx/3pM2gNm
54 Dead, 105 Injured After Tractor-Trailer Of Migrants Headed To US Crashes In Mexico
Will Biden pay reparations to these folks too?
BOMBSHELL: In court filing, Facebook admits ‘fact checks’ are nothing more than opinion
As we have previously reported, journalist John Stossel is suing Facebook after Facebook’s ‘fact checkers’ labeled climate change information that Stossel posted as “false and misleading”. In the middle of all this is the nefarious website “Climate Feedback” which has a bunch of climate zealots that write up what they claim are “fact checks” for articles, videos, and news stories they disagree with.
Facebook just blew the “fact check” claim right out of the water in court.
In its response to Stossel’s defamation claim, Facebook responds on Page 2, Line 8 in the court document (download it below) that Facebook cannot be sued for defamation (which is making a false and harmful assertion) because its ‘fact checks’ are mere statements of opinion rather than factual assertions.
Opinions are not subject to defamation claims, while false assertions of fact can be subject to defamation. The quote in Facebook’s complaint is,
“The labels themselves are neither false nor defamatory; to the contrary, they constitute protected opinion.”