BOMBSHELL: In court filing, Facebook admits ‘fact checks’ are nothing more than opinion
As we have previously reported, journalist John Stossel is suing Facebook after Facebook’s ‘fact checkers’ labeled climate change information that Stossel posted as “false and misleading”. In the middle of all this is the nefarious website “Climate Feedback” which has a bunch of climate zealots that write up what they claim are “fact checks” for articles, videos, and news stories they disagree with.
Facebook just blew the “fact check” claim right out of the water in court.
In its response to Stossel’s defamation claim, Facebook responds on Page 2, Line 8 in the court document (download it below) that Facebook cannot be sued for defamation (which is making a false and harmful assertion) because its ‘fact checks’ are mere statements of opinion rather than factual assertions.
Opinions are not subject to defamation claims, while false assertions of fact can be subject to defamation. The quote in Facebook’s complaint is,
“The labels themselves are neither false nor defamatory; to the contrary, they constitute protected opinion.”
A whole lot of WEASELING going on at FB.
Hope Stossel wins his lawsuit.
“Opinions are not subject to defamation claims, while false assertions of fact can be subject to defamation.”
I hope the judge doesn’t fall for that,
Fascistbook has been presenting opinion as if it is fact. And that’s why there’s a lawsuit.
Actually I don’t think anyone will be fooled, since every FB message says checked by FACT CHECKERS, not OPINION CHECKERS!
