Replies

DanDan November 30, 2021 2:31 pm

ICYMI – FYI – WTF — Trust Science — ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ —

Vaccine does not save lives…

https://youtu.be/hD0nwFHJPuw

7 mins.

(A lot of info and slides with graphs in short period of time- Presented by doctor at San Diego county board of supervisors meeting) ___

________________________

Colkitto November 30, 2021 2:22 pm

School Board Meeting Ends Early When Parents Applaud Man’s ‘Racist’ Comments (it was historically a very white, affluent area, with recent Asian imports to the Corporations nearby)

https://www.newsweek.com/school-board-meeting-ends-early-when-parents-applaud-mans-racist-comments-1653194

_____________________________

GGGGGrrrrrrrrrrrrr November 30, 2021 2:07 pm

Heh, heh. Interesting take, read the whole thing (WEF/DAVOS, NY Heating Oil Futures, heating oil consumption, Schwab)

“Reliable sources have confirmed that Klaus Schwab and even attendees have been getting such threats of violence and death that he has postponed Davos in January for the first time, claiming it is due to the pandemic, which is not true. Schwab is, at last, starting to realize that there is a price to his academic theories. There has been an avalanche in Switzerland but it is death threats rather than snow. This sweeping wave of anger is erupting worldwide, and there is no way that security measures can be enacted to protect world leaders. Even the Swiss news outlet sudostschwweiz has also reported about the violent threats. Both employees, as well as attendees, have also been targeted personally.

Schwab is going to discover that there is a huge price to pay for his bizarre ideas that you can destroy the world economy in 2 to 3 years and build it all back better, GREEN, in the blink of an eye. ”

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/wef/was-2021-the-peak-for-davos/

________________________________

Bob November 30, 2021 1:51 pm

Get your copy before it disappears!

Fauci Hold Patents on a Key HIV Component Used to Create COVID-19

By Dr. Jerome Corsi| April 28th, 2020

Why does Dr. Anthony Fauci’s name appear on 4 U.S. patents for a key glycoprotein that appears to have been inserted into a SARS virus chassis to create the current COVID-19 epidemic?

The legal portal Justia.com lists the following “patents by inventor Anthony S. Fauci” involving a glycoprotein found in the HIV-1, a disease that attacks the human immune system, leading to the Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, more commonly known as AIDS. In 1990, Fauci held the same position at the NIH that he holds today. Fauci made his mark around the anti-viral medications that were developed by Big Pharma to combat the AIDS epidemic raging at that time.

This same glycoprotein, identified as Glycoprotein 120, or simply as GP120, has also been found to be a key component of the current COVID-19, a disease that appears to combine a HIV-1 attack on the human immune system, with SARS CoV-1, the pathogen from the original SARS (“Severe Acute Respiratory System”) that created an international pandemic in 2002-2003. The pathogen in COVID-19 is named SARS CoV-2 in medical scientific literature.

The four patents on which Fauci is named as an inventor are the following:

Patent Number: 9896509, patent granted August 3, 2016. “Use of antagonists of the interaction between HIV120 and ?4?7 integrin.

Publication Number: 20160333309, patent application filed August 3, 2016. “Use of Antagonists of the Interaction Between HIV GP120 and A4B7 Integrin.

Patent Number: 9441041, patent granted September 13, 2016. “Use of antagonists between HIV GP120 and ?4?7 integrin.”

Publication Number 2016007586, patent application filed September 21, 2015. “Use of antagonists of the Interaction Between HIV GP120 and A4B7 Integrin.”

An article published by a group of medical scientists in India in the medical science journal BioRXiv in January 2020 was entitled “Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCov spike protein to HIV-1 and Gag.”

In a highly controversial finding, the medical scientists in India reported: “We found 4 insertions in the spike glycoprotein (S) which are unique to the 2019-nCoV and are not present in other coronaviruses. Importantly, amino acid residues in all 4 inserts have identity or similarity to those in the HIV-1 gp120 or HIV-Gag, all of which have identity/similarity to amino acid residues in key structural proteins of HIV-1 is unlikely to be fortuitous in nature.”

The article almost immediately was withdrawn after disinformation experts recognized the medical scientists in India were suggesting that COVID-19 was created by inserting the particular glycoprotein from the HIV-1 disease that involve patents held by or applied for by Fauci. Even more upsetting to disinformation operatives was the suggestion that the insertion of these 4 inserts into a SARS virus is not likely to occur in nature.

The clear suggestion was that COVID-19 was laboratory-created, possibly as a bioweapon, and that the creator of the virus used GP120 to do so, a glycoprotein from the HIV-1 1990s era that tied back to Fauci.

https://sicem365.com/forums/7/topics/66481

________________________________

WeThePeople2016 November 30, 2021 1:16 pm

Major Patriot @MajorPatriot 1h ·

Edited Within the last 24 hours

1) Ghislaine Maxwell trial started

2) CNN host Chris Cuomo was exposed for using his confidential sources to compile information on sexual-abuse accusers of his Governor brother, Andrew Cuomo

3) Jack Dorsey resigns as Twitter CEO

And just like that…

4) Twitter bans the sharing of private media, such as images or videos of private individuals, without their consent

__________________________

Bob November 30, 2021 1:12 pm

2015 Peter Daszak (EcoHealth Alliance) as reported in the National Academies of Press publication February 12th 2016 “We need to increase public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures such as a pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage, to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process.”

2016 A paper that was funded during the Gain-of-Function Moratorium and written by Ralph Baric stated: “…the SARS coronavirus is poised for human emergence.” It was not only poised for human emergence, it was now patented for commercial exploitation, 73 times.

2017 and 2018 The National Institute of Health file a Certificate of Correction to US ensure that it was the NIH maintained complete ownership rights.

This Patent was the one that gave the NIH the rights to develop the vaccine (later shared between the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill in November of 2019 and Moderna, in November of 2019). UNC Chapel Hill, NIAID and Moderna began the sequencing of a spike protein vaccine, avmonth before an outbreak in December 2019 ever happened.

March 2019 Moderna amended a series of 4 rejected patent filings to specifically make reference to a ‘deliberate or accidental release’. The intention of the patent applications was to commence the process of developing a coronavirus vaccine.

__________________________

Bob November 30, 2021 1:10 pm

January, 28th, 2000 US Patent 6372224 The first vaccine ever patented for coronavirus was actually sought by Pfizer. The application for the first vaccine for coronavirus was specifically for this S Spike protein, the exact same thing that allegedly we have rushed into invention in 2021.

April 19th, 2002 US Patent 7279327 The NIAID filed for a patent based on work funded by Anthony Fauci at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill started in 1999. The patent was for an infectious replication defective coronavirus. It was specifically targeted for human lung epithelium. In other words, we made SARS specifically to target human lung tissue, and we patented it several months before there was ever an alleged SARS outbreak in Asia.

April 2003 US Patents 7220852, 46592703P, 7776521 These 3 patents were sought by the CDC and not only covered the gene sequence of SARS coronavirus, but also covered the means of detecting it using RTPCR. This is a BIG problem as the CDC would then both own the patent on the gene itself, and its detection, giving 100% of the provenance of not only the virus itself, but also its detection.

Seeking these patents was a violation of 35 US Code section 101 as it is illegal to patent a naturally occurring substance.

The patent office twice rejected the patent on the gene sequence as unpatentable, because the gene sequence was already in the public domain (99.9% identity with the already existing coronavirus).

BUT…CDC paid an appeal fine in 2006 and 2007 effectively overriding the patent office’s rejection of their patent. In 2007 the CDC got the patent on SARS coronavirus.

Essentially, they paid a bribe to the patent office and what’s worse, they paid an additional fee to keep their application private.

28th of April, 2003 US Patent 7151163 3 days after CDC filed the patent on the SARS coronavirus (and 4 years before it was actually awarded) Sequoia Pharmaceuticals filed a patent in antiviral agents of tnt and control of infections coronavirus. In other words, CDC filed 3 days ereatmearlier, and then the treatment was filed 3 days later.

Sequoia Pharmaceuticals became rolled into the proprietary holdings of Pfizer, Crucell and Johnson & Johnson.

How would one have a patent on a treatment for a thing that had been invented 3 days earlier?

Also, this was issued and published before the CDC patent on coronavirus was actually allowed (2007). Is not physically possible to patent a thing that treats a thing that had not yet been published (especially given that the CDC had paid to keep it secret).

Jan 6 2004 Conference: “Bioterrorism, Emerging Infectious Diseases, Antimicrobial Therapeutics, and Immune Modulators” Merck introduced the notion of what they called “The New Normal”. “The New Normal” is the language that was adopted by the World Health Organization in 2020.

The Global Preparedness Monitoring Board hosted the conference. On the Board of Directors were the Chinese Director of Disease Control, Bill Gates’s Dr. Elias of the Gates Foundation, and Anthony Fauci.

2007 and 2008 World Health Organization state that we had eradicated coronavirus as a concern. But still billions of dollars is subsequently spent globally on a vaccine for a thing that had apparently been declared ‘eradicated’ in 2008.

5th of June, 2008 US Patent 9193780 Ablynx (now part of Sanofi) filed a series of patents that specifically targeted what we’ve been told is the ‘novel’ feature of the SARS COV-2 virus. Specifically they targeted the poly basic cleavage site for SARS COV, the novel Spike protein and the ACE-2 receptor binding domain which is allegedly novel to SARS COV-2. These patents were issued November 24th of 2015. And then…

In 2016, 2017, 2019 a series of patents, all covering the RNA strands and the subcomponents of the gene strands (specifically as it relates to the polybasic cleavage site, the ACE-2 receptor binding domain, and the spike protein) were all issued to Ablynx and Sanofi. And then Crucell, Rubeus Therapeutics, Children’s Medical Corporation, Ludwig- Maximilians-Universität in München, Protein Science Corporation, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, University of Iowa, University of Hong Kong, Chinese National Human Genome Center in Shanghai.

In total, there are 73 patents issued between 2008 and 2019 which have the elements that were allegedly ‘novel’ in the SARS COV-2.

There was no outbreak of SARS, because all elements of it had been engineered

_________________________________

Colkitto November 30, 2021 12:21 pm

Scientists Will Create A Deadly New Flu Strain, Just To Prove They Can

https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevensalzberg/2013/08/08/scientists-will-create-a-deadly-new-flu-strain-just-to-prove-they-can/?sh=671c463e4391