Posted on 11/23/2021 9:55:24 PM PST by ransomnote
Bkmk
Bkmk
Creepy mRNA
glissmeister
November 27, 2021 2:05 am
Without the emergency of “no effective treatment” there is no emergency to justify the emergency exemption and issuance of an EUP in the United States. This is the unshakable fact: when there is effective treatment there is no emergency. There is no justification to allow experimental vaccines to escape the standard process for testing and approving biologics for registered use as per normal.
Last I looked, every American man, woman and child is entitled to the safety and efficacy requirements that are the gold standard of the world. What kind of depraved miscreant conspires with foreign and alien corporate interests to deny Americans that sacred gold standard of safety and cheat them out of the standard processes and procedures that where developed over decades by devoted American professionals in science and medicine.
Who would conspire to cheat and betray and deny Americans the gold standard of drug and biologic safety by suspending the rules and granting emergency use permission when there was no emergency?
We are entitled to the safest possible, most comprehensively understood and thoroughly tested biologics per the highest standards of long established regulatory processes and requirements. What craven miscreants would conspire to do otherwise.
There are ample successful treatments clinically provided by highly talented, professional physicians who collectively have saved hundreds of thousands of patients around the world by novel use of highly effective methods and measures.
There is no emergency that justifies more EUPs in the United States. There is and apparently never was an emergency to justify the EUP for the biologics that have spectacularly failed while killing/maiming more inoculated persons than have been killed by all other forms and types of vaccines prior. These prior vaccines were products of the long-established safety and efficacy testing and normal registration process; registrations that were denied EUP; registrations that were fully tested under normal and standard regulatory process.
Revoke the EUP in the USA. These EUP are VOID as their emergency evaporated with the discovery of modalities of effective treatment that themselves appear to be mostly known (but covered up) at the time the EUP was granted, perhaps by a conspiracy to withhold certain material facts and the making of claims and assurances to gain exemption that were known to be our should have been known to be false. Such concerns of guilty knowledge at the time of conspiring to win the EUP could be reviewed under criminal statutes focusing on the wrongdoing of the individuals involved and the potential breach of duty and violation of the public trust that will typically accompany such insider dealings that corrupt what would otherwise be lawful process.
Then we need to look at the hospitals, their protocols, their trustees and officers, corporately and personally, and executive to determine how the money flowed. There is a public need to know; to determine if the equivalent of kickbacks or other financial incentives were paid to the hospital employees, officers or consultants in a suspicious or wrongful manner that resulted in criminal practices, the denial of care, tortious interference in the attending physician-patient relationship or otherwise mislead, maladvised or withheld clinical information which caused patients and or their physicians to not conduct early treatment or other treatments that have been shown to be successful in preventing hospitalization by other duly licensed and competent physicians. We also need investigation into maladministration resulting in murder-by-protocol and other serial iatrogenic death by collaborating in a conspiracy to prevent or otherwise be a gate keeper restricting or preventing the use of treatments readily shown by duly licensed competent physicians attending and successfully treating patients presenting with COVID disease.
If crimes were committed, there is likely no immunity for the wrongdoers. If crimes were committed, there is no escape or exemption from the liability and probably no insurance to indemnify the wrongdoing insureds from damages arising from a premeditated criminal act.
We need to first see the current EUPs void and returned to the gold standard FDA registration process. That would end the vaccination use controversy immediately and return it from a renegade use policy back to a properly established, proven customary regulatory process for biologics.
Competent physicians have a full inventory of effective treatments. Remove the tortious interference and allow them the sanctity and privacy of the attending physician-patent relationship.
The hospitals are but bubbling caldrons of Taft-Hartley and Sherman Act problems. We need consumer protection laws for patients and physicians.
Never, ever, should any third party or related interloper be able to lawfully interfere with patient and their attending physician primacy in determining what is medically necessary or acceptable by mutual agreement between them. They say. What they say, the insurer pays. No more tortious interference by interloping clerks or profiteering hospital administrators.
What good is your freedom to choose if YOUR attending physician has no liberty to advise to the fullness of their conscience and medical instincts regarding what is medically necessary for you?
This is all about Liberty and the conspiracy to usurp and monetize the usurpation of Liberty.
At every level, the forces aligned against the American People and promise of The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution and Bill of Rights are engaged in what appears to be a rather vast and complex, often ad hoc, criminal conspiracy to monetize the usurpation of our mutual and individual Liberty and our precious, unique society borne of revolution and Enlightenment Principles of human mutualism sustained in a hysteresis of individual liberty preserved by equal protection under the law and the equal application of the law.
The Right to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. That implicitly and unalienably includes the pursuit of health.
TICKER GUY:
I Told You What You Were Doing Was STUPID
[Comments enabled]
Oh, look what we have here...
{{https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.11.24.21266735v1 “Increased risk of infection with SARS-CoV-2 Beta, Gamma, and Delta variant compared to Alpha variant in vaccinated individuals”}}
We find evidence for an increased risk of infection by the Beta (B.1.351), Gamma (P.1), or Delta (B.1.617.2) variants compared to the Alpha (B.1.1.7) variant after vaccination. No clear differences were found between vaccines. However, the effect was larger in the first 14-59 days after complete vaccination compared to 60 days and longer. In contrast to vaccine-induced immunity, no increased risk for reinfection with Beta, Gamma or Delta variants relative to Alpha variant was found in individuals with infection-induced immunity.
You stupid *******s.
Oh, it gets better.
As expected there is now another variant that not only evades the vaccines the evidence is being vaccinated may make the infection worse.
Yeah, I warned you about this. Almost a year ago.
Sit and spin, fools, since you didn’t stop this bull**** from the government, the so-called “doctors” and pharma by whatever means you needed to.
https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=244330#discuss
Interesting Video.
I haven’t looked close at that but my instinct tells me the new “variant” is either a fake to make an excuse for what kills off the vaxxed, or it was designed to do so from the outset and was just released. Africa is where Gates tends to try out his new goodies so I’m leaning towards the latter. Open to another explanation. We will see where this goes. We are definitely at war, as Trump said at the outset.
United States v. Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330) District Court, S.D. New York
So far we have Maurene Comey (James' daughter) as the lead prosecution in Maxwell's case.
And the judge, Alison Julie Nathan, had served as associate White House counsel for Renegade.
Also: During the 2004 campaign season, she acted as John Kerry's Associate National Counsel for the Kerry-Edwards Democrat Campaign for President. She got her BA in Philosophy and Women's Studies from Cornell University in 1994. (Is that even a thing?? Women's studies?)
Alison J. Nathan
Adjunct Professor of Clinical Law
Clearly a feminist type. So far her rulings have not been very favorable to the defense and she seems to be doing what she is supposed to be doing as a recipient of a degree in Women's Studies, and that is, standing up for women who have been abused and trafficked, etc.
So we will see what happens soon enough.
P.S. Does anyone have a degree in Men’s Studies?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.