Anyone want to verify this?
Anyone want to verify this?
RE: Chrystal Kizer
Looks like there is a lot out there about this:
https://engine.presearch.org/search?q=crystul+kizer
I pulled this from the Wiki page & has a good citation:
“On June 2, 2021, the Wisconsin Court of Appeals released a published decision, finding that the trial court had erred when denying her the ability to raise, as an affirmative defense, WIS. STAT. § 939.46(1m), related to victims of human trafficking and child sex trafficking.[8]”
Why in the world would the DA deny this defense because it’s very possible she was a victim of trafficking? The DA in Kenosha needs to be investigated.
Kizur is more of a “burning bed” case than self-defense. Her case was appealed and it was found that the judge erred and she should have been allowed to present an “affirmative defense” defense.
https://www.legalmomentum.org/amicus-briefs/wisconsin-v-chrystul-kizer
Same day Rittenhouse verdict. - Fl. black man not guilty - self-defense.
https://meaww.com/andrew-coffee-iv-found-not-guilty-race-legal-system-kyle-rittenhouse-verdict