To: MrRelevant
NO. It was legal. The gun issue is no longer part of this trial. So drop it.
4 posted on
11/17/2021 12:54:10 PM PST by
dforest
(Freaking insane world. )
To: dforest
Anything about crossing state lines with gun?
6 posted on
11/17/2021 12:54:55 PM PST by
blackdog
(Jab Dodger. )
To: dforest
Irrelevant issue. Kyle shot 3 really bad guys.
8 posted on
11/17/2021 12:56:28 PM PST by
alstewartfan
("She looks like she's 19 years old, sitting there like a lady with her legs crossed." Creepy Joe)
To: dforest
While Kyle may be off the hook, I did hear the prosecutor tell the judge he was charging/taking to trial Kyles friend, the one who purchased the gun, with something (straw purchase?) this coming January.
10 posted on
11/17/2021 12:57:31 PM PST by
Magnum44
(...against all enemies, foreign and domestic...)
To: dforest
Valid question though. I suspect that MrRelevant asked because of misinformation on social media and came to FR to get the facts for his pending response.
14 posted on
11/17/2021 12:58:18 PM PST by
dhs12345
To: dforest
There was a similar gun case in our town. An old man shot two home intruders dead. They were armed and the old man’s grandchildren were in the house.
He was not charged with murder. However he did have a burglary conviction from way back in the 60’s or 70’s, so he was charged as a felon in possession of a gun. They gave him a light sentence.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson