Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The establishment is attacking those who oppose vaccines. Where’s the truth?
American Thinker ^ | 6 Nov, 2021 | Terry Paulding

Posted on 11/06/2021 4:26:25 AM PDT by MtnClimber

A reader objected to my last post in which I questioned “vaccinating” children. I’d cited Steve Kirsch in the article, linking his slide deck of facts, which is rich with documentation and live links to sources. The reader counted with a rebuttal from Jeffrey Morris, a Ph.D. from Penn specializing in biostatistics and cancer. From the expansive Kirsch deck, he picked certain statistics to refute, relying on this statistical information to discredit the whole.

Does Morris make cogent points? Who is he? Is he qualified to speak on the subject? His CV shows focused accomplishment within his field. Interestingly, he published a Philadelphia Inquirer article in April 2020, questioning the effects of the lock-down and testing regimen then in use, as being counter-productive and dangerous to society. He had a point; in fact, testing is currently being employed as punishment for the unvaccinated, yet all but ignored for the vaccinated cohort.

Here’s what Morris says about Kirsch’s killed vs. saved claim:

They claim to independently validate these results with another dozen or so alternative “methods”, but these consist of a series of largely unscientific arguments including anecdotal reports (some unverified), opinions elicited from select clinicians who believe the vaccines are inherently dangerous and/or treatment strategies like Ivermectin are the answer, public polls on whether people “know” more people who have died of COVID-19 or vaccines

SBIP

Hmmm…you mean like the deliberately small sample size of cherry-picked test subjects for the study determining whether the vaccine is safe for children? No, I don’t think that’s what Morris was referring to. He probably also wasn’t referring to the fact that they vaccinated the control group in all the vaccine trials as soon as possible afterward, either. That is NOT the way you conduct a trial, as it obviously eliminates all meaningful follow-up.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Health/Medicine
KEYWORDS: anticommunism; communism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last
To: MtnClimber

The weird part is that most of us aren’t anti-vaxxers. We need to see better long-term safety from MRNA technology.
I saw a video sometime ago featuring a leftist comedian turned pundit, Jimmy Dore.

He posted one of his side effects to Twitter and was shut down aa anti-fax.
He reiterated that he took the vaccine and by sharing these issues it will make the vaccines better since they are still experimental. Apparently that made him super anti-fax.

The or mind game on this is crazy.


21 posted on 11/06/2021 6:43:02 AM PDT by PrincessB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PrincessB
The weird part is that most of us aren’t anti-vaxxers.

The Deep State wants to make you feel guilty for THINKING.

If the vaxxine are killing people and the evidence shows that, then everyone should be able to think that the vaxxes are DANGEROUS without the deep state mind games.

22 posted on 11/06/2021 10:22:04 AM PDT by politicianslie (Those who got vaxxed need to update their wills. Fall flu season approaches & vaxxes HURT immune sys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson