“Houston, we have a problem.”
In the article, Karl Denninger crunches the numbers and proves that the 5% of batches responsible for 100% of deaths can’t be coincidental or otherwise explained away.
Post #1 on the thread includes Cathi’s explanation (from a prior email) of Denninger’s other article(s) in which he has been trying to alert the public that 1.2 million people are ‘missing’ from U.S. demographics, and I included a link to his article.
It's an open forum.
"In other words the best-fit hypothesis is that causing the body to produce part of a pathogen when that part has pathological capacity (as we know is the case for the spike) cannot be controlled adequately through commercial manufacturing process at-scale. This means that no vector-based, irrespective of how (e.g. viral vector or mRNA), not-directly-infused coronavirusjab will ever have an acceptable safety profile because some lots will be “hot” and harm crazy percentages of those they’re given to with no way to know in advance.
The basic premise used here — to have the body produce the agent the immune system identifies rather than directly introduce it where you can control the quantity, is a failure.
It has been my view all along that the cv19vx batches contained a high % of placebo, different mrna concentrations etc. We’re in an ongoing clinical triat