Congress made crucial change to vaccine definition weeks before COVID-19
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/congress-expanded-vaccine-definition-just-weeks-before-covid-19/
Re: The Significance of Tracking Excess Deaths from All Causes
As many have noted, the risk of complications from Covid-19 mRNA inoculations is not just limited to the immediate period surrounding the inoculation, but may persist for an indefinite time and likely increases the more pathologic Spike Protein one’s body accumulates with repeated injections.
Tissue damage largely comes from the attachment of the Spike Protein to ACE receptor sites, which are in the endothelium of the vascular system, and their propensity to cause coagulation of red blood cells as a result. The combination with patented nano-lipoproteins enables the Spike to travel to all areas of the body, which the original SARS-CoV-2 virus could not. The choice of Spike Protein to be the antigen used to produce antibody is unfortunate, since it is the arguably the most pathogenic part of the Corona Virus.
Because of this delayed effect of inducing disease in many different organ systems, hearts, lungs, kidneys, brains, and what have you, people actively following the destruction wrought would want to follow the Excess Death Statistics and not just the deaths immediately following Covid infection or mRNA inoculation.
Wanting to get a handle on what’s happening, I looked into this and found to my surprise that the best user-friendly source for this Excess Death data is The Economist magazine website. While the data is available elsewhere in csv and tabular format, The Economist makes it easy to reference and explore in detail.
ICYDK The Economist is the fan mag of the Globalist Big Club, read by politicians, corporate moguls, movers and shakers. Similar to what The Times is/was to the British aristocracy in time past, and the Daily Worker was to the American Communist Party before it morphed into the Democrat Party. It’s where they go for heads-up orientation and point of view harmonizing.
The Economist has devoted significant resources to intensely track, of all things, Excess Death Statistics. To me this is curious, because tracking deaths from all causes seems unlikely to yield actionable public health information and would be of more interest to those of a eugenic or necrophilic inclination. Here are a few samples of what is available at their website:
(I'm not going to try to capture the graphics. They are too small on the CTH post anyway to see much.)
Excess Deaths data is also available at the State level, so people who are very interested in Excess Deaths can keep a feel for the pulse of Excess Deaths and how that’s working out. There is even a section on Excess Deaths after the first 50 Covid cases
If you scan the graphs at the website you will notice:
States that have a big jump in excess deaths include FL, OK, AL, LA. KY, TN, GA, TX, AR, MS. MO, SC
States with relatively low levels of excess deaths include: NY, NJ, CT, SD, RI, MA, ND, DC, WV, CA, MI, PA, IA, WI, MD, IL, MN, NC, CO, VA
Draw your own conclusions.
https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/coronavirus-excess-deaths-tracker
That rule to change the definition of the term “biological product” proposal hit the federal register in 2018.