That’s a generous assessment. I frankly don’t think they were all that deceived or even just wrong. More nefarious is my way of thinking. May be bought off.
TICKER GUY:
Are You ****ed? Maybe. But.. How Bad?
[Comments enabled]
I don’t like this at all.
Here, we report, besides generation of neutralizing antibodies, consistent alterations in hemoglobin A1c, serum sodium and potassium levels, coagulation profiles, and renal functions in healthy volunteers after vaccination with an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Similar changes had also been reported in COVID-19 patients, suggesting that vaccination mimicked an infection.
That is very bad.
In fact its catastrophically bad.
Vaccination is supposed to trick your immune system into thinking your body is being attacked without producing the bad outcomes that the actual disease can produce. You get the protection, but not the potential bad outcomes from infection itself.
That is the entire point of vaccination; to evade the possible bad outcomes from infection.
Since a traditional vaccine (which this is; inactivated whole virus) cannot replicate it should never produce the bad impacts from disease itself. That is, the only “dose” your body gets from an inactivated vaccine is what is in the syringe; no more, no less.
Unfortunately what this study shows is that a material number of these bad effects from infection come from vaccination as well. That’s unexpected and hideous, especially some of the markers that showed up — including most-specifically A1c.
It is of particular note that A1c did not return to baseline over 90 days post jab. In fact, it remained elevated with some formerly-healthy people now being in the “pre-diabetic” category. This cannot be understated in terms of what it means: Diabetes is arguably the most-serious morbid condition you can contract. To take a person with a healthy A1c level and turn them into a pre-diabetic by telling them to take the jab is criminally insane.
If you are healthy and thus not at any special risk from Covid-19 you’d be out of your damned mind to accept that risk with certainty by taking the shot and if you are coerced into it the proper response is to be placed right between the coercing party’s eyes.
Diabetes is that serious folks.
Additional durable deterioration was found in both potassium (electrolyte balance) and creatinine, which is a kidney damage marker. I remind you that unlike your liver which can regenerate you only have two kidneys and if they fail you’re ****ed.
What’s particularly ugly is that if you get hammered with a so-called “breakthrough” infection later on these deteriorations, which appear to be durable, may well screw you down the road. Both are serious co-morbid factors that radically increase the risk of getting screwed if you get Covid-19.
Now to be fair this study is on a whole, inactivated vaccine. It therefore may — or may not — generalize to the mRNA jabs.
We do not know.
But don’t you think we should know?
Indeed since the jabs used in the US (and Europe) all “program” the body to produce the spike protein, and we know the spike is pathogenic, it is entirely reasonable to believe that these impacts not only exist with mRNA and viral vector jabs they may in fact be materially worse than those from whole, inactivated virus.
More to the point shouldn’t we have run this sort of testing and thus known, by published studies, before we jabbed 200 million Americans and threatened the rest?
If this sort of durable damage does happen how often does it happen and how-severe is it?
Folks, the change in immune markers along with creatine and A1c is flat-out nasty. Let me quote from the study itself:
This is a comprehensive investigation of the pathophysiological changes, including detailed immunological alterations in people after COVID-19 vaccination. Results indicated that vaccination, in addition to stimulating the generation of neutralizing antibodies, also influenced various health indicators including those related to diabetes, renal dysfunction, cholesterol metabolism, coagulation problems, electrolyte imbalance, in a way as if the volunteers experienced an infection.
And while some of those returned to baseline over the subsequent 90 days renal dysfunction and diabetes markers DID NOT.
Together, these data suggested that after vaccination, at least by day 28, other than generation of neutralizing antibodies, people’s immune systems, including those of lymphocytes and monocytes, were perhaps in a more vulnerable state.
So to “evade” the risk of Covid-19’s serious outcomes you deliberately damage the immune response for at least some period of time against all manner of other things, some of which are at least as dangerous as Covid-19 is.
Bluntly put in the period following taking the jab you appear to be at much-elevated risk from other infections. Nobody knows but that the jabs impair your immune response on at least a temporary basis for a month or two appears to be established.
Much worse some of those markers, even three months in, do not return to their former values. Specifically, electrolyte levels (potassium in particular), A1c and creatinine. The latter two, markers for diabetes and kidney damage are extraordinarily serious. That they do not return to normal within 90 days implies the damage vaccination causes may well be permanent.
Our study postulates that it is imperative to consider the potential long-term impact of vaccination to certain medical conditions34 or to general human health.
No kidding? ...snip...
https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=244131
LINK TO STUDY:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41421-021-00329-3.pdf
I wouldn’t be at all surprised! So much corruption in this world, and dirt of all types.