Posted on 10/16/2021 11:02:58 AM PDT by Kevmo
for the cold fusion ping list
LOL. It was fascinating to read, but I was a LIFE scientist.
WTF did I just read???
:-)
I’m an amateur radio operator, I know 327.37 Mc falls within the military air UHF band. IIRC, it’s near their version of an ILS system.
Scheist (not the rock) then I am Sirius lee in trouble.
Definition: “news” noun. Newly received or noteworthy information, especially about recent or important events
This is more old science from August 2019. Nothing cold fusion newsworthy happened in 2021?
Every now and then you have to shake or kick the patient just to be sure it is still alive...🙄
After all these years we finally have the answer to “What’s the frequency Kenneth?”.
So let me get this, LANR science aka lattice lab techs are searching for resonant frequencies to surge net positive energy output, is this the gist?
If so, what is the fuel source? Potential? Spin? And what are the byproducts?
Please fill in the gaps, TY.
The Cold Fusion/LENR Ping List
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/coldfusion/index?tab=articles
Keywords: ColdFusion; LENR; lanr; CMNS
chat—science
—
Vortex-L
http://tinyurl.com/pxtqx3y
Best book to get started on this subject:
EXCESS HEAT
Why Cold Fusion Research Prevailed by Charles Beaudette
https://www.abebooks.com/9780967854809/Excess-Heat-Why-Cold-Fusion-0967854806/plp
Updated No Internal Trolling Rules for FR per Jim Robinson
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3928396/posts
If someone says stop, then stop. Do not enter onto a thread on a topic you don’t like just to disrupt, rattle cages, poke sticks, insult the regulars, or engage in trolling activities, etc. ~Jim Robinson
Please refrain from posting anything that doesn’t legitimately address the issue.
Something is going on in this segment of science. There are a considerable number of research groups studying the matter. -Sidebar Moderator
You DO note that this is in “General/Chat” and NOT “News/Activism”??
And yes, there is a lot more going on with LENR than is posted here.
What you read was some progress in LENR by just one researcher, Mitchell Swartz, who famously hooked up a Stirling Cycle Engine to his NANOR device for months, prior to this. Kinda hard to fake that.
I’m singularly impressed by your usage of the word ‘definition’. Then you will have NO trouble with the definitions of the words posted by the sidebar moderator with respect to LENR threads:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3977426/posts?page=19#19
Comment #13 Removed by Moderator
Comment #14 Removed by Moderator
Comment #16 Removed by Moderator
Comment #17 Removed by Moderator
Comment #18 Removed by Moderator
This topic has a following, people who wish to learn and discuss the materials presented.
Please refrain from posting anything that doesn’t legitimately address the issue.
Something is going on in this segment of science. There are a considerable number of research groups studying the matter.
19 posted on 7/19/2021, 6:45:09 PM by Sidebar Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies | Report Abuse]
What he’s looking for is a SIGNATURE that LENR is taking place. If he has found it, progress could be rapid from here.
It’s a laugh a minutes reading Chet’s pitbull threads.
Then why not post something newsworthy? If this topic of two years ago was worthy of “discussion” then there should be dozens of follow up experiments and papers expounding on the significance of 327.37mhz. Post those if you got ‘em.
I’ll wager I know as much about cold fusion as anyone here, having studied, designed and built a Rossi contraption that would have made any excess heat obvious.
Unfortunately the field is filled with bad scientists and charlatans. So I understand why you don’t like me commenting.
Let me Google that for you - here’s one from April, how’s that grab you?
http://ikkem.com/iccf23/orppt/ICCF23-IA-16%20Swartz.pdf
Thanks!
Better! A half page paper with a graph. References are a bit hilarious— a claim that Nitonol metal came from UFO crashes.
Care to share your opinion? Is this good science? Demonstrates excess heat acceptably?
If that picture you posted shows your best effort, it is no surprise you failed to see positive results. I built better rigs in grad school forty years ago.
"Unfortunately the field is filled with bad scientists and charlatans. So I understand why you don’t like me commenting."
No, it is because you are a typical skeptopath. You built a piece of junk, didn't see results, therefore all positive results have to be chalatanry, and not your own lack of commpetence.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.