I don’t know Derek Carr, but he may be trying to make the opposite point of what people are interpreting. He may be saying that most folks have skeletons in their closet — especially the holier-than-thou woke crowd and corporations who canceled Gruden — so why don’t they open up so we can take a look at their emails as well.
Again, don’t know what he’s actually thinking — and I could be WAY off base here — but that’s the impression I get.
That is exactly what he is doing. Derek Carr is a Christian and is a lot like Tim Tebow......................
You’re post #31 and finally Derek Carr is shown in the proper light. He was totally irony-factoring the whole issue. And he’s right.
Not one person alive could stand that kind of scrutiny. But Carr’s implication is that, if it’s fair to do it to one guy, it’s only right to do it to all. Plain as day.
Exception: none of us could survive the kind of financial and other kinds of microscopic examination our Prez DJT was subjected to — except Trump himself. They tried SO HARD to find anything actionable on him, and failed.
“I don’t know Derek Carr, but he may be trying to make the opposite point of what people are interpreting. He may be saying that most folks have skeletons in their closet — especially the holier-than-thou woke crowd and corporations who canceled Gruden — so why don’t they open up so we can take a look at their emails as well.
Again, don’t know what he’s actually thinking — and I could be WAY off base here — but that’s the impression I get.”
That’s how I read what he said, as well.
“I don’t know Derek Carr, but he may be trying to make the opposite point of what people are interpreting.”
I agree. I think he is saying it wasn’t fair to just make Jon’s emails public. People who live in glass houses should not throw stones.