I remember in the weeks before the EUAs were granted each company kept updating their publicly reported numbers.
Someone remind just how billionaires have been created among/within Big Pharma since COVID began, kkthx. /s
No industry has more lobbyists in Washington than pharmaceuticals. DC bought and paid for.
Pfizer should be tarred and feathered. After getting hung.
I read a similar “relative vs. absolute” risk reduction shell game about the alleged benefit of statins in reducing fatal heart attacks.
Dutifully mouthed breathlessly by FR’s own Bagdad Bob.
bkmk
Far too many people can’t muster up enough brains to distinguish between ‘percentage difference” and “percentage points difference.” It’s not at all misleading to say the jab is 95% more effective than no jab. I highly doubt those numbers are real. But it’s not misleading But it would be quite misleading to talk about “1% more effective.” That’s wrong!! It’s 1 percentage point more effective but relative to the control group that is a lot more effective.
The data shows the 95% reduction is a Big Lie. They showed the actual data and it’s clear this is fraud.
Today’s most important article.
Finally someone is making this point clearly and with substantive data and corroboration. The actually risk reduction in minuscule and has been all along. Even that reduction is short lived. This whole thing is a scam. As POTUS said initially a cure would be much better. The deep state/pharmy essentially blocked cures to bring about massive profits & the great reset.
“Yaweh Theo has not given us a spirit of fear but of Love Power and a Sound Mind”
“Former Pfizer VP”
Hasn’t worked for them for a decade, he was not the VP of the company, and did not work in the infectious disease or vaccine division - that was not and is not his field of expertise.
But it fits the narrative, so that’s what counts. Who cares if the fake news sources give him fake titles, fake credentials, etc.
Yes, I believe this was the study where when you delved into the data tables at the back of the study, it showed that the vaccinated people in the study were still contracting COVID at a comparable rate to the unvaccinated people in the study.
The pro-vaxxers never read past the “95%” figure in the intro...
“Only 37,706 of 43,998 enrolled participants were included in final safety analysis. A reason for 6,292 enrolled participants not being included in final safety analyses was unable to be located within the New NEJM publication.”
posted 4 minutes ago by Threeballes
0 comments share save hide report block
https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/covid-19-restoring-public-trust-during-global-health-crisis
