|
Posted on 10/07/2021 5:22:13 PM PDT by ransomnote
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this awakening as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding 'mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3038)
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?"
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
Reminder ... 3:15 eastern ... please keep praying for America.
***A great big THANK YOU to all those who prayed/are praying for the torn cornea. Your prayers are greatly appreciated. Tuesday will shed more light on the issue.***
Seeking help…
Good Afternoon Everyone and especially RN,
I lurkalot, but read virtually every post on this thread. You folks in many ways are friends and confidants though we haven’t met. Quick aside: From the many post over the years I’ve gleaned that one poster is an old shipmate, and another, to whom I was able introduce myself just this past Tuesday night, is a member of two local organizations that I belong to. Hope one day to meet more of you, perhaps at the join up.
Yesterday, Friday, we got the notification where I work of implementation of the presidential mandate.
From the responses here I know that I am not alone in this situation. I am very fortunate in this as the first day I can retire is always today. So, I am contemplating what course of action is best. It’s come down to two choices, try to work the system and retire next year as planned (my retirement package was already submitted), or retire now.
There are many considerations either way, but the first course allows me fight the good fight, obstruct, and attempt to inform as many as might listen as to the reasons (including support of the Constitution which I have sworn to since July 1978) for not taking the jab. The other path is leave as soon as possible, showing my contempt for the system that has broken faith with so many who gave so much of their lives and energy to contribute to the common good. This second course of action will have the added benefit of allowing me to begin life in retirement sooner, where I will have more time to do those things important to me (prolife work, teaching the faith to young people at church and the many things I enjoy that I cannot do now as works takes a lot of my, beginning to wane, energy).
Disciplinary action can begin as early as 9 November for those of us recalcitrant folk who reject the jab.
The first thing that I am seeking help with is to find a report mentioned some time back in about a Department of Defense or perhaps a Department of the Navy report about cold like symptoms experienced by about 30 percent of military personnel who received the yearly flu shots.
This report would become part of my response and preparation for the counseling I will receive as part of the disciplinary process. Here I want to thank you Ransomnote for the tremendous work of compiling data and references about the dangers of the COVID “vaccine”. Many of those references will also be in my response.
The second item thing I would like to know are your thoughts on my courses of action. Many here have served the country in the military, civil service or as contractors, many are retired already and can give a longer range perspective. I think everyone here (the trollish excepted) love this country and what makes it so special both in history and in the world today.
Thank you very much. VR/Pat
Despite being approved for religious exemptions for the COVID-19 vaccine, an employee reported that 140 staff at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, face unpaid leave beginning Oct. 15.
Leon Workman, a Linux systems engineer with ORNL, told The Epoch Times that though he was approved for a religious and medical exemption, he will join the 140 employees who will be left without a paycheck.
“It’s blatant religious discrimination,” Workman said. “A religious exemption without an accommodation is not a religious exemption.”
The research laboratory is managed by the University of Tennessee-Battelle (UT-Battelle), a not-for-profit company established to operate the U.S. Department of Energy-sponsored center comprised of 5,500 staff members.
In a Sept. 22 email Workman disclosed, ORNL’s Human Resources Director Jody Zahn told employees who had filed for an exemption that regular testing and allowing employees to continue to work from home, as they have been doing since January 2020, would cause “undue hardship” on the center.
“In evaluating your request, UT-Battelle has concluded that the only reasonable accommodation that we can provide to you without presenting an undue hardship is to allow you to remain a UT-Battelle employee, but without access to campus, by providing you with an unpaid leave of absence,” Zahn said. “You may elect to designate vacation time use prior to beginning your unpaid leave, but if you do not do so, your unpaid leave of absence will begin on Oct. 16 if you choose to remain unvaccinated.”
Zahn cited a high volume of approved requests, high transmission and low vaccination rates, a threat to health and safety of employees, and cost of testing the unvaccinated, as well as an intent for the center to bring remote workers back to the institute, as reasons for undue hardship.
“But unpaid leave is an undue hardship on an employee,” Workman said.
Workman filed for religious exemption in September and contracted the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus, commonly known as the novel coronavirus, the pathogen that causes COVID-19.
After being treated with monoclonal antibody infusion therapy, he applied for a medical exemption in addition to the religious exemption because of the CDC’s recommendation that one not get vaccinated 90 days after the treatment, he said.
The Fact Sheet
Human Resources formed a panel, with a fact sheet, and summoned 24 employees to interview regarding their exemption.
“Two days later they claimed that two individuals who were involved tested positive for COVID-19, so the next day the panel did a blanket approval of all religious exemptions without any kind of adjudication or discernment,” Workman said.
According to Workman, the panel had “aggressively pursued” each employee’s religious beliefs, using a fact sheet.
In the fact sheet, ORNL says that fetal cell lines have been used in earlier vaccines, over-the-counter medical products, and “have been used in the past by consumer product companies including Pepsi, Nestle, Kraft, Campbell Soup, and Coca-Cola to test the ingredients and enhance flavor.”
The fact sheet claims that COVID-19 vaccines don’t contain fetal cells or fetal cell products.
The Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines being offered at ORNL “were designed on computers,” the fact sheet says, adding that “neither is produced using fetal cell lines.”
The fact sheet also claims that many religious faith leaders “favor COVID-19 vaccinations on the grounds of care for one’s neighbors, family, and self.”
Accompanying the fact sheet is the religious exemption certification form an employee must sign stating that he or she has read and understood the vaccination policy and the fact sheet.
“I am aware that fetal cell lines are used in the testing of other consumer products,” it says.
It then states that “honesty requires that we tell the truth, always, and that we do not mislead others,” therefore, “with this understanding,” the form asks that the employee to certify that he or she has not, does not, or will not “use any of the products identified above, nor any other product that was developed, produced, or tested using fetal cell lines.”
Among the products listed were over-the-counter medications such as Tylenol, Advil, and Preparation H.
Legal Recourse
Workman and about 80 other staff members involved have sought legal representation with Schaerr-Jaffe, the law firm representing United Airlines employees.
“We are hoping to have a temporary restraining order by Oct. 12, which would cause them to halt progress on forcing people on unpaid leave,” Workman said. In September, Schaerr-Jaffe negotiated a temporary restraining order that led to United Airlines agreeing to cease its plan to terminate 2,000 of its employees who declined to get the COVID-19 vaccine for religious or medical reasons.
A Stalemate
“They are scared to terminate us, probably because of misgivings about potential non-lawful termination, but it’s still a termination, although in a slow and painful way for the employees,” Workman said. “They are basically leaving us without paychecks for as long as it takes us to either force us to get the vaccine or to resign.”
ORNL was not immediately available for comment.
Dang!
Just got a reverse 911 message about an armed and dangerous fugitive in my neighborhood. “Lock doors and windows”. The, you know, “usual suspect”.
I went outside and saw cop cars blocking the street at either end.
Now I’m watering the front yard packing my ccw.
A senior Victoria Police officer has publicly resigned from the force during a live-streamed interview after expressing her objection to the way directions from the state’s chief health officer were being enforced in some situations.
In Australia, chief health officers have emergency powers under the Biosecurity Security Act 2015 to make and impose public health orders in attempts to protect human health from COVID-19.
Former Acting Senior Sergeant Krystle Mitchell, who has worked for Victoria Police for more than 16 years, appeared in police uniform in an interview with media studio Discernable, which aired on Friday night.
“I couldn’t be happier in terms of the work that I do on a daily basis,” she said in the video. “But behind that is all of my friends that are police officers, that are working the front line and are suffering every day enforcing [the Victorian chief health officer’s] directions that a vast majority, or certainly a great majority, don’t believe in and don’t want to enforce.
“The consequences of me being here today is that I will be resigning from Victoria Police, effective at the end of this interview, because the consequences of me coming out publicly would be dismissal,” she told Discernable host and founder Matthew Wong. “So I’m choosing to quit, and I’m quitting because I can’t remedy in my soul anymore the way in which my organisation that I love to work for is being used [to enforce health tyranny]… and the damage it’s causing in the reputation of Victoria Police and the damage it’s causing to the community.”
She described an incident when she and her partner were walking together in the city and witnessed “police everywhere doing their ‘reassurance patrols.'” She commented, “They’re not reassurance patrols, you’re not reassuring anybody in the community, you’re scaring people in the community that there’s that many police out in the city trying to stop mass gatherings.”
Mitchell explained why she decided to take the interview while still being employed within the police force instead of having resigned beforehand.
“In part, the reason that I wanted to do this whilst still serving and wearing the uniform today is so that the community can see that it isn’t all police that are against them and for police to see that it isn’t all protesters that are coming there to fight with you. It’s a minority,” she said. “There’s a minority on both sides and they’re the ones getting the attention in the media. The minority of the police … are using more force than is necessary to effect these arrests at protests, or to enforce [chief health officer] directions.”
The Epoch Times understands that Mitchell resigned on Friday morning, and she is now on personal leave and will not return to work.
Prior to her resignation, Mitchell worked in a non-operational role and did not work at any protests. Protesters Rally In Melbourne Calling For End To Victoria's Lockdown Restrictions
Speaking about Mitchell’s interview, Victoria Police said in a statement that officers have been working tirelessly for the past 18 months to enforce the chief health officer’s directions “aimed at slowing the spread of coronavirus to keep all Victorians healthy and to save lives.”
“The comments in this interview in no way reflect the views of Victoria Police. The CHO directions are based on health advice and set by the Victorian Government. Victoria Police cannot pick and choose what laws it enforces. We acknowledge this has been an extremely difficult time for all Victorians who have had to give up so much,” the statement reads.
It continues “Just like the community, Victoria Police looks forward to the easing of restrictions and the eventual return to pre-COVID life.”
The statement also said that officers take their duty to protect and serve the community incredibly seriously, and the force understands “how fragile public trust can be” and that it was “important people can have confidence in what we do.”
It also addressed mandatory vaccination for members of the force, saying that while officers had important human rights, “these must be weighed against the interests of the community during this public health emergency.”
More anti-lockdown protests were organized in Melbourne on Saturday.
Victoria Police said it supported the right for people to peacefully protest “and this has not changed.”
“While now is not the time to protest due to risk of the spread of the virus and the current restrictions, Victoria Police is committed to facilitating peaceful protests once the directions allow,” the statement said.
Melbourne, a city in Victoria and has received global media attention after multiple videos emerged showing police attacking unarmed people, sometimes in a violent manner, amid local protests in recent weeks against COVID-19 vaccine mandates, passports, and lockdowns. The protests often occur on weekends at locations that organizers provide short notice for, to evade police interference.
Melbourne has seen the longest lockdown in the world. Lockdown restrictions continue across the city and parts of regional Victoria. The state continues to urge people to take the COVID-19 vaccine, with promises to ease restrictions once 80 percent of people are fully vaccinated.
ThankQ. Power corrupts many.
Glad to be a little person.
Yes, we’ve heard all about Joe Biden’s alleged vaccine mandate for private companies employing 100 or more people. It was all over the news even before he announced it on September 9. His announcement has jeopardized the employment of millions of Americans and increased worker shortages in critical domains such as health care.
There’s only one problem. It’s all a mirage. Biden’s so-called vaccine mandate doesn’t exist — at least, not yet. So far, all we have is his press conference and other such made-for-media huff-puffing. No such rule even claiming to be legally binding has been issued yet.
That’s why nearly two dozen Republican attorneys general who have publicly voiced their opposition to the clearly unconstitutional and illegal mandate haven’t yet filed suit against it, the Office of the Indiana Attorney General confirmed for me. There is no mandate to haul into court. And that may be part of the plan.
According to several sources, so far it appears no such mandate has been sent to the White House’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs yet for approval. The White House, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and the Department of Labor haven’t released any official guidance for the alleged mandate. There is no executive order. There’s nothing but press statements.
Despite what you may have been falsely led to believe by the media fantasy projection machine, press statements have exactly zero legal authority.
“There is nothing there yet that gives employers any mandate,” Stephanie McFarland, spokeswoman for the Indiana Occupational Safety and Health Administration, told me Oct. 6. “The president made an announcement on this asking OSHA to do it, but we’ve not yet seen anything come from it yet,” she also said. When the state agency gets any further information, she said, they’ll review it.
To impose the public perception of a mandate, the Biden administration is following an unusual rule-making process it also employed earlier this year, called an emergency temporary standard (ETS). The spring ETS rule took nearly six months to issue. Meanwhile, companies are telling reporters their vaccine mandates will have at the latest December deadlines. (For those who can’t calendar, that’s four months after Biden’s non-existent mandate was proclaimed. According to OSHA, an ETS takes up to six months to go into effect after the initial mandate is issued in the Federal Register — which, again, for the proclaimed 100-employee mandate hasn’t happened yet.)
Lawyers for big business were blunt about their love for this mandate mirage: “Everybody loves this cover,” Minneapolis employment lawyer Kate Bischoff told Bloomberg Law in September. “Many were already looking down the road at doing this, but the fact that they get to blame Biden is like manna from heaven.”
Using the ETS procedure instead of normal federal rule-making processes both allows the Biden administration to push its demands faster and without any public input or requirement of responding to public input, which is normally required of even legally laughable federal rule-making like this one would be. That is part of why ETS rules have been overwhelmingly overturned in courts.
“OSHA has used that legal authority only 10 times in 50 years,” David Rivkin Jr. and Robert Alt wrote in the Wall Street Journal in September. “Courts have decided challenges to six of those standards, nixing five and upholding only one.”
There are many other reasons any federal vaccine mandate would be obviously illegal and unconstitutional, Rivkin and Alt write, including that “The states have plenary police power to regulate health and safety. Congress has only those limited powers enumerated in the Constitution. That wouldn’t include the authority to impose a $155 fine (today’s equivalent of the $5 at stake in Jacobson) on an individual who declines to be vaccinated, much less to prevent him from earning a livelihood.”
But who needs the Constitution when you have an American people conditioned for compliance with even wildly outlandish things the screen people insist they must think and do?
Earlier this week, the Wall Street Journal published a letter from Bruce Atkinson making several excellent observations about the nonexistent mandate, including the following:
The mandate’s nonexistence shields the Biden administration from legal challenges that may ultimately restrict the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s authority. Yet the mandate is still effective at compelling industries and companies into compliance, as it leaves room for any eventual issuance to target noncompliant entities. This implied cudgel is particularly effective on industries and companies that are dependent on federal spending or the goodwill of federal regulators. The nonexistent mandate also allows so-inclined state and local governments and companies to issue their own mandates, seemingly in lockstep with Washington.
The Biden White House has been well-served by presenting a nonexistent mandate as a done deal.
Now, let me see, what presidential administration does all this remind you of? Why, that of Mr. “Pen and Phone” himself, Barack Obama.
His also wildly unconstitutional Deferred Action for Child Arrivals was simply a two-page memo, for example, but it is still allowing some 616,000 people to simply ignore major U.S. laws, and could easily be reinstated by courts as litigation continues nearly a decade later. It seems that, given such unchecked gains from openly lawless actions Democrats have turned into standard operating procedure over the years, Joe Biden feels free to reduce that constitutional contempt to simply a phone now.
What this “government by press release” also allows is for Republicans like Indiana Gov. Eric Holcomb to complain about Biden’s tyranny while using zip, nada, zilch of their elected authority to stop it. Holcomb has used the same executive rule-by-decree throughout the lockdown era without effective restraint by a supermajority-Republican state legislature, even telling the press churches were required to deliver Christ’s Body and Blood his way while quietly keeping that part out of his executive orders, surely because government dictating religious exercise is obviously unconstitutional and would quickly have generated lawsuits.
All this allows weak Republicans and evil Democrats to shadowbox each other for the cameras while ordinary Americans suffer under their abdicated leadership. By the time Republican attorneys general get around to filing lawsuits over any eventually issued legal documents that fulfill Biden’s promises, the vast majority of people not wanting government to force them into medical procedures will likely be unemployed, forcibly injected with treatments that have almost no track record, forced from their education paths, provided with fake documents like these citizens are beneath COVID-rule-exempt illegal aliens, and all the rest.
This is how weak Republicans keep letting Democrats go right on gleefully disemboweling our rights just like they have nearly 50 million of the American unborn. Gee, thanks, “public servants.” Tell me another one about how you love American liberties and the Bill of Rights. I’ll believe that when I see you sacrificing anything substantial to fight for them.
What Democrats are doing as Republicans stand down yet again is a moral and constitutional abomination. Not even the fig-leaf pose of a pen signing balderdash-filled documents is needed for today’s Democrats. Whatever they say, you do. You have no rights or say in the matter, no possibility for objecting to even them forcibly injecting things into your own body and the bodies of your children.
These people believe they are royalty, and too many Americans are acting like they’re these losers’ serfs instead of citizens endowed by God with inalienable rights, including the right to consent — through elected representatives, not never-elected dictatorial bureaucrats — to rules that restrict our rights, everyday lives, and human dignity.
Excellent! I emailed it to myself to modify on my own case.
I’m thinking of filing both a religious AND medical exemption. I just need to drag it out until June.
In the UK, the COVID-19 infection rate is higher among the fully vaccinated than the unvaccinated for everyone above the age of 30.
If the vaccinated are catching and spreading COVID-19 at a higher rate than the unvaccinated, what is the point of a vaccine passport❓
@KanekoaTheGreat
I examined the image of the vax card in the photo at the top of the page. It’s the first one I’ve seen. Do all the vax cards have 4 lines in reality? Isn’t this a confirmation that there are two shots plus at least two boosters planned?
~~~~~~~~~~
I’ve seen Euro vax cards with 8 numbered lines for ‘shots’.
_______________________________________________________
They don’t even hide what they’re planning.
Once upon a time long ago I knew people personally who could tell me the real story. That is why I am where I am now. But we are all old, retired, disabled or dead (Or in prison) now. No one to ask over a glass of bourbon “What really went down?” or “Is he really the moron he seems?”.
I may not know the absolute, detailed truth but I know who the liars are. I’ve been adding to the list since the nineteen sixties.
What I know now is an extension of what I knew then - how things work. I was an artilleryman. I know about trajectory and other things too like - You can’t un-pull the lanyard.
Lotta static on this push but I think I heard “Shot. Over.”
Your views always much appreciated.
Probably not even until June.
This tyranny cannot continue much longer.
I like your style!
I agree completely
Click on the links for Moderna, Pfizer, etc. to see which cell lines were used for each, and how.
Click further down on the page under New! Fetal Cell Line Chart to see where each fetal cell line was derived from.
I didn't know that most of the cell lines were from abortions in the 1960s and that all but two listed were from outside the US.
I read and commented on the BS thing about all the products involving fetal cell lines; it was a setup by a Catholic priest and some jerk female doctor who did a quick Goolag search for {medicine name} and {cell line}.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
