Any website who hides their ownership and doesn't disclose how they make money or where their funding comes from should automatically be suspect, whether they confirm our bias or not.
In the case of Daily Expose, their ownership is hidden and given the number of ads on the website, it's pretty easy to determine how they're making money: clickbait.
I've read enough articles on Children's Health Defense to see the flawed logic they use (correlation always equals causation) and that just doesn't do it for me.
I also don't trust the CDC or FDA to be truthful about a damn' thing at this point so you cannot call me a vaxxhole either.
Question Everything. That's my motto. Whether it confirms or conflicts with my own bias'.
Be nice if you held the gaslighting alphabet news agencies to the same standard.
Question Everything
........
I
Do. Lol. Trust and verify.
I did not advocate blind trust in anything. I recalled as I went to click ‘post’ that it would be overrun with people screaming “THERE’S NOTHING TO SEE HERE! MOVE ALONG!”
People who identify themselves when publishing information contrary to the narrative tend to have their lives destroyed when possible - the MSM and Tech overlords are ‘not amused’.
I do question - and that’s why I posted this article. I don’t dispense with entire publications like you do - I question.
What about activities like this from the left do you find not feasible considering their history?
Pfizer own website site outed themselves.