Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Hostage

I prefer watching it on video.

https://rumble.com/vn83au-lin-wood-drops-truth-bombs-at-kandiss-taylor-rally-10121.html


217 posted on 10/03/2021 11:21:29 AM PDT by Spirit of Liberty (~Truth does not mind being questioned. A lie does not like being challenged.~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]


To: Spirit of Liberty

I would like a posters on this thread who claim wood isnt a nut job to go on the record right now after watching that clip

We all need to know who is in his crazy camp


219 posted on 10/03/2021 11:26:23 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies ]

To: Spirit of Liberty

Everything he said on video is factual.

He mentioned CGE but he didn’t say directly that it was used in the way that Newspuke Lemon said Wood DENIED planes flying into the towers. Does it cause concern? Yes, but Wood did not say DIRECTLY that planes flying into the Towers was a computer hoax.

I have friends and family in Manhattan and Staten Island who witnessed the event. They would never agree that anything but planes flew into those towers.

But then Wood went on to repeat what the investigation found, that there were no aircraft remains in the WTC or the Pentagon.

There were other reports of wreckage found by the usual fake news suspects but I throw those in the trash because once someone lies to me, I don’t give them another chance, ever, unless they confess sincere genuine belief in the one True God. No, I don’t follow their lies, I only accepted as evidence the official reports and they stunk.

According to official reports what Wood said is true. In fact, the official report said that aircraft remains had been incinerated with the heat. That is a stinking explanation and there was much stink in the official reports. Does that mean there were no planes flying into the WTC? No, it means there was no evidence of AC remains found, nothing more, nothing less.

Why do I think it stinks? Because I was trained in a multimillion dollar military engineering program and the technical reports I read were deficient and seemingly deceptive.

Does that make me believe no planes flew into the WTC? No, it only makes me disgusted that such reports were signed off on because they stunk.

They stunk like the evidence the Biden officials presented to show he won on November 3.

So I read through the analysis of WTC 7 which was complete crap summarizing that somehow the heat plasma from the WTCs hit by the planes “arc’d over” to WTC 7 and weakened its structure causing it to implode like in controlled demolition.

That report along with discussions with other engineers that I know and respect made me aware we likely have more bad actors in our government than imagined. That awareness is confirmed by what is found today.

Wood went on to talk about the trillions embezzled from the defense budget which was a true repeating of official allegations at the time, how the papers detailing that embezzlement were all in the Towers that came down and in the Pentagon section that was hit, all true statements, and how there was going to be n investigative hearing on the embezzlement in November 2001, true again.

Wood is a VERY SUCCESSFUL lawyer, VERY. He knows exactly what to say and how to say it. He never said outright that planes did not fly into buildings that day but he came close. He did say the Pentagon was hit by a missile, not a plane. That is backed by evidence and there is direct evidence that the evidence of missile attack on the Pentagon was suppressed. It’s evidence, not proof.

No I don’t believe that planes did not fly into the Towers that day except for WTC 7. WTC 7 is a red flag, a huge red flag. And Wood mentioned it.

Wood is also privy to credible informants. His statements have weight. He doesn’t care what the liar newspukes say about him. Do I believe he’s 100% correct in all his claims? No, but I do believe he tries to be correct and more importantly he tries to make people aware that things are not what they are reported to be.

If Lin Wood makes you have second thoughts about things, that’s good. It doesn’t mean that what he says is Gospel, it means he is making you to be someone that is NOT easily suckered, someone that will stand back and say “Show Me” and even then to be demanding for strict proof and not allowing you to be fed bullcrap.

IOW, set your standards high, at least higher than Newsweek.

Jason Lemon writes a headline “Lin Wood Claims No Planes Hit Twin Towers ...”. No he didn’t make that claim. He didn’t make that claim because he’s a lawyer and either he does not have proof as of yet, or he has evidence but it’s flimsy, or he has solid evidence but it’s being held back, or he has only information and belief but will not claim it because it won’t hold up in court. In any case, Wood did NOT make the claim that “No Planes Hit Twin Towers”, he didn’t say that and given his lawyer experience, he wouldn’t say that.

Therefore, he’s not unfit, instead he is calculating, measured but revealing and making people skeptical of what the liars in the media and inside or tied to government are filling the airwaves with.


235 posted on 10/03/2021 1:17:32 PM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson