Posted on 10/03/2021 8:34:54 AM PDT by joesbucks
Pro-Trump attorney Lin Wood continues to promote conspiracy theories and misinformation at conservative events around the country, claiming at a Friday rally that no planes hit the Twin Towers or the Pentagon on September 11, 2001.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsweek.com ...
You keep referring to WTC-7. That’s not what I was referring to.
You wrote in post 363:
“If someone finds a photo of an AC part from the 9-11 incidents, that part would certainly be in official reports.”
You wrote “reports” and “incidents” - as in plural.
As noted prior, there’s an official government website re: United 93 that shows aircraft parts at the crash site. That website and the reports are all government records. All “official”.
And here’s what you wrote in post 363 about AA 77 crashing into the Pentagon:
“But where are plane parts? “
So you’re clearly making claims about plane parts at crash sites other than New York City. Claims that are rebutted by government records.
Failed. Nice try, though. Embrace the suck.
25 But Paul replied, “I’m not out of my mind, most excellent Festus. On the contrary, I’m speaking words of truth and good judgment.
“Debris was found..”
Yeah, something is going on. The United 93 NPS website has a section that has pictures of aircraft parts at the crash site.
WTC-7 keeps being brought up when claims are being made about aircraft parts and all crash site.
-see https://www.nps.gov/media/photo/gallery.htm?pg=3941191&id=C7A45234-155D-451F-67A019C294E6A905
Debris was found by third parties unconfirmed by official sources.
All official reports spun a story of incineration.
The unofficial reports would never hold up in a court of law.
You appear to think things aer true because you saw them on the internet.
I dont waste my time with conspiracy nuts...
> “You wrote “reports” and “incidents” - as in plural.”
You’re not very bright are you?
“The NTSB, through the FAA, investigates most plane crashes. Investigators publish a Preliminary Report, a Factual Report and a Probable Cause Report.”
Multiple Reports.
Wait a minute !
It’s turtles all the way down !
A fool loses an argument when they resort to Ad Hominem attacks.
Bye-Bye loser.
Oh my! you picked up some embrace the suck lingo on the internet. Wow! So impressive!
Re: 386 - Claims were made, so I determine if the claims are supported by the facts.
There were aircraft parts found at the United 93 crash site. The NPS web-site has photos showing the aircraft parts.
An ASCE report on the Pentagon building has a figure that shows aircraft parts found in the Pentagon. That’s not an official report. The official report for the Pentagon crash has been ordered and will arrive in 5-7 days. We’ll see what is has to say. It’s clearly an official report (record), just as the photos on the NPS are official.
Very well said.
This is what you said earlier>
“Wood is not you enemy. He is on your side.”
You don’t know me yet you claim he is on my side. What do you base that one? Do you have facts to support your claim. You won’t because I responded by saying he isn’t on my side and explained why.
If you don’t support Lin Wood, then you ought to be alright as you won’t likely suffer the fate he and others will. Those who promised Trump much but failed. Trump didn’t get to be a multi-billionaire real estate tycoon in NYC following the Queensberry Rules. Those who crossed him or failed to deliver paid the price.
So my cousin in New York didn’t see what he says he saw? He was looking at the building when the second plane hit.
“What do you think happened to the wings?”
I would suspect they sheared, exploded and burnt on impact, a 747 has 8 wing tanks four on each side, some have tanks in the tail, there’s also a main body tank. If all tanks are full you have a total of 57,000 gallons of fuel weighing in at 380,000 lbs.
> “You don’t know me yet you claim he is on my side. What do you base that one?”
If you are on FR, chances are you do not consider Joe Biden as legitimate.
So if Biden is against you, then Wood is for you because the enemy of an enemy is a friend.
So simple to understand. If you don’t get it, then move along.
Good explanation and I think it’s true now that I remember fuel tanks in the wings.
So you think the wings, fuselage, landing gear all incinerated with the heat of the explosion?
Would you say some AC portions were flung far on impact and should have been found?
Flight 93 parts were found but they crashed into the ground, not a building. Difficult to understand how crashing into a building would incinerate everything yet crashing into the ground would not, other than the dispersion area of the remains is larger on the ground. Ii don’t know, there are facts missing.
3 planes crashed into buildings and 1 into the ground. Those are the facts. People who doubt this should study up and then honestly accept the facts.
I am so sick of hearing people spread dishonest alternative ideas. And I am especially sick of hearing that some of them are claiming to be Conservative that spread such blatant falsehoods. They give Conservatives a terrible name:( so can we please set the record straight that real Conservatives believe it was planes? The ones spreading these alternative theories are just trying to harm the cause of Conservatives. Perhaps they do so ignorantly but even if this is the case its still doing us all harm.
A wise man doesn’t argue with a fool. I resort to deserved humor. Looks like you resort to insults.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.