Agreed, Spunky. Anything anybody posts on the internet seems to be deemed creditable nowadays, even when the ‘source’ is just the usual blogs where they’re quoting each other with nothing substantial being offered.
I remember seeing several people post “Trump/Pompeo 2024” at various places on FR. Pretty sure I saw one or two posts about the possibility of Pompeo being part of the group that comprised Q, or at least of his being a ‘white hat’.
And remember how quick everyone was to take a ‘wait and see’ attitude about the rumored Noem/Lewandowski affair? Shouldn’t the Pompeo story receive the same treatment?
“And remember how quick everyone was to take a ‘wait and see’ attitude about the rumored Noem/Lewandowski affair? Shouldn’t the Pompeo story receive the same treatment?”
Yes I remember and yes you would think everyone should have the benefit of the doubt until it is actually a fact but unfortunately it is not that way.
one person writes a hypothetical article, then others present it as evidence. That’s how the Russian hoax went. Not saying this id the case.
👍👍