To: ChicagoConservative27
Legal information for folks:
Without a body, there is NO case at all. Nothing. He either has to admit he did something to her, OR, they have to find a body. Otherwise, no charges can be filed.
86 posted on
09/16/2021 6:57:13 AM PDT by
MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
(Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
You can use circumstantial to convict someone for murder without finding the body.
97 posted on
09/16/2021 7:04:51 AM PDT by
CaptainK
("If life's really hard, at least its short")
To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
Without a body, there is NO case at all. Nothing. He either has to admit he did something to her, OR, they have to find a bodyThey need to look at the bottom of the cliffs they hiked.
125 posted on
09/16/2021 8:01:09 AM PDT by
1Old Pro
(Let's make crime illegal again!)
To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
“... or they have to find a body. Otherwise, no charges can be filed..”
Wrong. There was a case in my county decades ago where a Mom went missing. No body. They had a bit of evidence from their young child... but she could only testify that she saw her mom’s legs on the ground. He was convicted and they found her body AFTER the conviction via a jail house snitch. May be a harder case to prove but you don’t need a body.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson