To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
You can use circumstantial to convict someone for murder without finding the body.
97 posted on
09/16/2021 7:04:51 AM PDT by
CaptainK
("If life's really hard, at least its short")
To: CaptainK
You can use circumstantial to convict someone for murder without finding the body. You can, but it's VERY challenging.
In one case a leg was found and the defense attorney successfully argued that since a man can live without a leg, finding a leg was no proof of his death!
And if you try and fail, and the accused is acquitted, they cannot be charged again under double jeopardy when a body finally turns up.
Most grand juries will no bill a case without a body.
106 posted on
09/16/2021 7:11:47 AM PDT by
null and void
(No jab/no job = Only the compliant can work, they won't spread dangerous ideas around the workplace!)
To: CaptainK
You can use circumstantial to convict someone for murder without finding the body.Very difficult. Has to be a lot of evidence. Generally, with no body, no case.
120 posted on
09/16/2021 7:56:06 AM PDT by
MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
(Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson