Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
You can use circumstantial to convict someone for murder without finding the body.
97 posted on 09/16/2021 7:04:51 AM PDT by CaptainK ("If life's really hard, at least its short")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]


To: CaptainK
You can use circumstantial to convict someone for murder without finding the body.

You can, but it's VERY challenging.

In one case a leg was found and the defense attorney successfully argued that since a man can live without a leg, finding a leg was no proof of his death!

And if you try and fail, and the accused is acquitted, they cannot be charged again under double jeopardy when a body finally turns up.

Most grand juries will no bill a case without a body.

106 posted on 09/16/2021 7:11:47 AM PDT by null and void (No jab/no job = Only the compliant can work, they won't spread dangerous ideas around the workplace!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

To: CaptainK
You can use circumstantial to convict someone for murder without finding the body.

Very difficult. Has to be a lot of evidence. Generally, with no body, no case.

120 posted on 09/16/2021 7:56:06 AM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin (Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson