http://www.skirsch.com/covid/VAERS_death_calc.pdf
Jane, please open the above and read page 17.
It compares adverse events for the jabs compared to the rate for all vaccines from the period 2015-2019, for the age range 20-60 (e.g. not just cherry picking the elderly to make things look bad).
Read pages 5-15 for how they used 8 different methods to estimate 150,000 deaths so far in the US from the jabs.
Page 5 of the Kirsch analysis, he suggests two hypotheses for the reporting for Covid. One is that the vaccine has caused no deaths, the second is that adverse events are being reported at the same rate as previous years.
Considering the barrage of Covid news, it seems likely that Covid reporting would be higher than for other vaccines. Further, the other vaccines have been around for awhile with tolerable adverse event frequencies. Are reporters going to take these as seriously?