But did they misrepresent?
In that context, it’s still a false term. One has to prove something is a vaccine in order to declare its critics to be against vaccines—for starters.
Doubling down on personal attacks will not bolster credibility.
They did. They outright lied about how the vaccine has been represented. Anybody actually paying attention knew LAST SUMMER they didn’t think it would be one shot total protection for life. Saying they said is a misrepresentation.
No it’s not a false term.
Doubling down on your lies just proves you’re a liar. I don’t truck with liars. We’re done. Reply all you want, I ain’t reading it, because we know you’re just writing lies.