the captioned thread starts out talking about s1 and long covid. Ok fine. Valid point. Then it's oh, it's only the vaccine s1 to worry about for decadesss!. Give me a break and save it for scaring little kids on the internets.
and, p.s., smokers may not have been hospitalized as much, seeing that most of the early hospitalized were nursing home people who weren't smokers, but when they were, pretty good chances they're dead, Jim
Stop flailing, you are embarrassing to watch.
I did not direct your attention to the graphene oxide specifically.
I posted weeks ago what looked like a legit trade journal for water treatment which talked about introducing GO into the water supply in Britain. I don’t know why it’s there (even ostensibly).
The issue with the vaccine s1 is that the jabs are guaranteed to introduce trillions of spike protein molecules into your body, or mRNA to produce trillions of spike protein molecules. Natural exposure to the SARS CoV-2 or whatever the preferred moniker is by the pedants, is not guaranteed to do that: each virion has 24 +/- 9 spike proteins. So you need a severe infection to get a large load of spike proteins into your body by that route.
Bad move on your part mentioning nursing homes: those deaths are due to Dem governors.
And your argument is circular reasoning: smokers were not hospitalized as much because other people were hospitalized more. You’re confusing absolute count with percentages.
Why was there such a low absolute number of smokers hospitalized? The signal is that that nicotine had some protective effects. The link explains why — apoptosis of the S1-modified cells.