[blueplum]

regressing to 10yo and calling names doesn’t make your case any more valid.

at your age you should know, just like taking antibiotics or blood pressure meds, vaccines of any kind for any disease take time to build serum levels - of antibodies.

The vaccine mfgs have been very clear that two shots of their vaccines were needed and protection wasn’t complete until after the second shot. When people schedule their first shot they are given a second appointment. It’s been that way from day one. Noone is buying it’s a lie or a surprise.

They do look at the deaths in the first 2 weeks - and you know that too. For contact tracing and for cause.

For example TTS = 28 cases, 3 deaths or 1death/3million; risk factors: obesity, diabetes, birth control/estrogen. Wow, I’m scared. not.

Let’s see how scary myo-pericarditis is - 789 cases. Or 15?
“in all the reported cases of myocarditis related to COVID-19 vaccine, clinical symptoms resolved within 6 days with preservation of the cardiac function. Third, no complications were reported in any of these patients. This analysis shows that myocarditis related to COVID-19 vaccine has an overall fast recovery with no short-term complications.”

https://www.ajconline.org/article/S0002-9149(21)00639-1/fulltext

That’s supposed to me shake with fear? I don’t think so

.

[grey_whiskers]

If people have received the jab, then deaths after that should be counted against "those who have received the jab".

They look at the deaths in the first 2 weeks, but attribute them to the unjabbed.

Counting those deaths among the unjabbed SERIOUSLY falsifies the picture.

And in favor of getting the jab.

As Dana Carvey's Church Lady would say, "How conveeeeeeeenient."

And you're throwing all kinds of smoke and chaff and squid ink in the water.

I didn't mention a thing about "OMG they need a second shot" -- the "Pfizer Barbie" video which I posted and mocked ages ago, comes out and says it ("We'll have to do this again after my second shot." "Oh I love you Ben.")

As far as myo-pericarditis...I don't trust the "official" numbers out of VAERS.
Harvard had that study that 1% of adverse events make it into VAERS.
There are scads of people talking among themselves about adverse events which the doctors unilaterally decide on the spot "can't be due to the jab" and so they don't get reported.
Others have talked about how difficult it is to get through to VAERS and complete a report.
There was someone identifying as a board certified MD (who had reported to VAERS in the past and ALWAYS received a personal call-back within 4 hours), who tried to report a severe adverse event, only to have the person on the other end of the line *hang up on them.*
And they have set up an alternative system for reporting events (v-safe) which doesn't connect to VAERS.
And one of the MDs has spoken of a whistleblower within the CDC who claims the true number of *reported* deaths (using a number of other systems besides VAERS) was 45,000.

So airly dismssing things with the "deBOOOOONKED muh official numbers" doesn't hold water anymore, nobody believes you.
AND...

AND
"Hurr Durr The Science is Settled Muh Consensus"

They're pathological liars.

Anybody who shills for them loses ALL trust and credibility.

AND

How do they know IN ADVANCE there's going to be an outbreak of Acute Flaccid Myelitis?