Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GM recalling another 70,000 Chevrolet Bolt electric cars
CNN Business ^ | Fri August 20, 2021 | By Peter Valdes-Dapena,

Posted on 08/23/2021 11:54:32 AM PDT by Hojczyk

General Motors is recalling another 73,000 Bolt EV and EUV electric vehicles in the United States and Canada for a problem that could cause the vehicles to catch fire.

GM had earlier announced that the recall would cost $800 million, but that was before the recall was expanded to cover all remaining Bolt vehicles. The recall is now expected to cost an additional $1 billion. The recall comes after GM had previously recalled about 70,000 Bolt vehicles for the same potential problem. The recall now covers Bolt EV and EUVs from 2017 to 2022.

GM had previously said that the problem with the Bolt batteries was caused by two rare battery manufacturing errors in model years 2017 to 2019 vehicles, and that more recent models did not undergo the same battery manufacturing process and so were not included in the recall. Now, though,

GM is recalling 9,335 more model year 2019 Bolt EVs and another 63,683 model year 2020 through 2022 Bolt EV and Bolt EUV models. The Bolt EUV is a taller crossover SUV version of the Bolt EV.

The recalled Bolt vehicles can catch fire after being charged due to a manufacturing defect, the company said. Until the batteries in the recalled vehicles can be checked and replaced, if necessary, GM recommends the vehicles be set to charge to only 90%. Owners should also charge their vehicles more frequently and avoid allowing the battery to be depleted to less than about 70 miles of driving range.

The vehicles should also be parked outdoors right after charging and should not be charged indoors. GM now says it is pursuing reimbursements from Korean battery manufacturer LG, the company that made the batteries that, GM said, are the cause of the problem.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: automotive; bolteuv; boltev; canada; chevy; elonmusk; generalmotors; michigan; tesla
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: GreenHornet

I’d ship them to the home of a green life obsessed former phb-ette.


21 posted on 08/23/2021 12:23:02 PM PDT by wally_bert (I cannot be sure for certain, but in my personal opinion I am certain that I am not sure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

They lost a shirt on this! It seems to approaching the record loss from the Fiat deal about 20 years ago.
But is is not just GM. All Lithium Ion batteries explode. Tesla had a lot of fires too. So did Toyota at all!
let us face it. One should NOT buy any e-vehicle, even hybrids like Prius.
Even the lethargic FEMA issued a statement how to deal with exploding e-batteries (Hit - nothing)


22 posted on 08/23/2021 12:23:11 PM PDT by AZJeep (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0AHGreco RomNQkryIIs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: KierkegaardMAN; All

Bingo. The greenies are incapable of planning, rational thought, and critical thinking skills. I’ve brought up this topic dozens of times ever since the gay-mobile (Prius) came out.


23 posted on 08/23/2021 12:23:15 PM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isn’t common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

My 25 year old Saturn (GM) is still going strong. It hasn’t caught fire once or ever been recalled.


24 posted on 08/23/2021 12:30:10 PM PDT by MulberryDraw (The COVID risk is about the same as the flue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

Im not even surprised these idiots manage to produce 60,000 Dolts..I mean Bolts.


25 posted on 08/23/2021 12:48:59 PM PDT by max americana (FIRED LEFTARD employees at our office every election since 2008 and enjoyed seeing them cry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

That’s an easy fix.
Just install fire extinguishers in key places around the car.


26 posted on 08/23/2021 1:16:42 PM PDT by TigersEye (Who shot Ashli Babbitt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Is NBC soaking the interior of the BOLT for better pyrotechnics? They fabricated Pinto stuff didn’t they?


27 posted on 08/23/2021 1:29:39 PM PDT by LeonardFMason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

$1 billion additional for an additional 73,000 cars. That works out to just under $13,700 per car.

With gasoline and diesel engines you would occasionally hear of engine fires. The repairs would be something like part of the wiring, or a switch, or fuel injector. The repairs would be at most a few hundred bucks a car WITH labor!

Here they are replacing the entire battery packs: the most expensive component in the car, and one that the target buyers couldn’t even afford at the price GM would have to charge without taxpayer subsidies.

I’ve heard these batteries are obsolete and don’t use the same technology as GM’s newest stuff. How many of the public will get that message or understand it? And are these obsolete batteries even still in production? Do they exist large enough numbers to support the recall?


28 posted on 08/23/2021 2:40:34 PM PDT by motor_racer (Who will bell the cat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KierkegaardMAN

The old toxic batteries will be buried in landfills next to all of the windmill blades that have no natural form of disposal.


29 posted on 08/23/2021 2:40:42 PM PDT by Bernard (The very best scientific articles always contain this phrase: “My personal intuition has been…”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AZJeep

Toyota prius used NiMh at least the early years.


30 posted on 08/23/2021 2:46:51 PM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (All I know is The I read in the papers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: albie

Pinto was different. Ford’s official policy was it was cheaper to pay the families vs recalling and fixing.

That was proven and tarnished Ford for a lot of years.


31 posted on 08/23/2021 2:49:09 PM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (All I know is The I read in the papers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: motor_racer

I’ve heard these batteries are obsolete and don’t use the same technology as GM’s newest stuff. How many of the public will get that message or understand it? And are these obsolete batteries even still in production? Do they exist large enough numbers to support the recall?

Actually it is a good deal for older Bolt owners. At about the time you would need replacement batteries, you get a free upgraded set of batteries.


32 posted on 08/23/2021 2:54:42 PM PDT by Steven Scharf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Steven Scharf

It would be cheaper for GM to just buy back the cars. But that would be admitting failure.


33 posted on 08/23/2021 2:55:39 PM PDT by Steven Scharf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Bleeding edge innovators - gotta have the latest and greatest... :-D


34 posted on 08/23/2021 3:06:15 PM PDT by larrytown (A Cadet will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do. Then they graduate...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Based on the number of vehicles recalled (73,000) and the cost to repair ($1 Billion), the cost of replacing the battery in vehicle is $13,698.63

GM ought to just put in a 4 cylinder gas engine in each one and give each owner $2500 on a gas card. They would be money ahead...


35 posted on 08/23/2021 3:17:35 PM PDT by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

According to the Toyota spec, Prius LE and L Eco have Lithium ion batteries. The AWD-e has the Ni-hydride battery. I believe the Lithium are exploding!


36 posted on 08/23/2021 3:21:49 PM PDT by AZJeep (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0AHGreco RomNQkryIIs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: shotgun

Yope, but, you forget, the ENVIRONMENT!
They MUST produce some e-vehicles as mandated by the government. Whatever the cost is!


37 posted on 08/23/2021 3:23:31 PM PDT by AZJeep (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0AHGreco RomNQkryIIs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: shotgun

Nobody wants a four cylinder Ford motor, let alone in a heavy chassis.

They just don’t know this yet


38 posted on 08/23/2021 3:29:44 PM PDT by SheepWhisperer (My enemy saw me on my knees, head bowed and thought they had won until I rose up and said Amen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Not even in park. Their Achilles heel was being rear ended.


39 posted on 08/23/2021 3:43:17 PM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (All I know is The I read in the papers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

Lot of cars in the old days (like my 67 Camaro) have the fuel filler neck in the back panel below the trunk lid. Obviously that isn’t great if you get rear-ended. The Pinto has the neck on the side, but there were sharp points on the differential and shock absorber attachment that would puncture the tank as it got displaced.


40 posted on 08/23/2021 3:48:10 PM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson