H/T Mass Psychosis CTH Well since I didn't say 'ruining' I'd say you are wrong here.
H/T Mass Psychosis CTHFarcesensitive: The legislature SHOULD ban businesses from requiring the frankenshot and she SHOULD sign it.
xone: Perhaps they will. I can see you are in line for the gov’t running your business.
Sorry, I misread “running your business” as “ruining your business”, my mistake. But the idea that preventing businesses from mandating vaxes is the same as “running your business” is just as specious.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3988004/posts?page=1600#1600
And your new reply:
Again wrong. Businesses can make you make decisions you might not otherwise make to stay employed with them. There is no force. As noted in an earlier comment a poster worked for a company that treated its people like crap. But they paid well. So in the calculus better money was worth being treated as crap. Is taking the jab worth the dough> I’d say no. So I’d drag it out get fired at the worst time for them. Take UI and see if I have an action against them for wrongful termination.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Again, specious. Businesses may indeed require a uniform, certain kind of haircut, night shifts, special training, on call on weekends - all kinds of things people might prefer not to do. But requiring a vax in order to work is not in the same category, it is violating constitutional rights. And your argument that people who don’t want to get vaxxed and would prefer not to get fired or quit are all about $$$, you are wrong. Did you hear the firefighter captain in LA? Or the one in Hi? Or the perfusionist or other medics? They love their jobs for one thing, and for another thing, there may often not be another similar job where they are. So they’d need to sell their house, move to another city/county/state, start all over again, and maybe that business or fire department or hospital will also decide “vax up or get fired”.